1. ) MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ BIN MANSOR 2. ) MUHAMMAD AIMAN BIN MAHAMAD 3. ) MUHAMMAD FATHURRAHMAN BIN AMMAR EFFENDI 4. ) MUHAMMAD AMIR BIN ABDUL RAHMAN v Pendakwa Raya

ra-44-1-06-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 15 June 2025 • RA-44-1-06/2025 • 4 min read
1 cases cited (0 SG, 1 foreign)

Catchwords

Mahkamah ini berpendapat bahawa memandangkan kesemua Pemohon tersebut telahpun disabitkan dengan kesalahan rogol berkumpulan di bawah seksyen 375B Kanun Keseksaan, yang mana merupakan suatu kesalahan yang serius, maka adalah tidak wajar untuk Mahkamah ini membenarkan penangguhan atau penggantungan pelaksanaan hukuman penjara tersebut ke atas Pemohon-Pemohon. Berdasarkan alasan-alasan di atas, Mahkamah ini telah menolak permohonan Notis Usul Pemohon-Pemohon tersebut.

Judges (1)

Arik Sanusi bin Yeop Johari Delivered

Counsel (5)

Naran Singh & Co. Firm Pejabat Penasihat Undang-Undang Negeri Perlis Firm Mohd Alif Farhan Bin Hassan Counsel Prosecution Mohd Hadi Hakimi Bin Harun Counsel Prosecution Muhamad Aiman Haziq Bin Saiful Kamal Counsel Applicant

Parties (5)

Pendakwa Raya Respondent Muhammad Aiman bin Mahamad Applicant Muhammad Amir bin Abdul Rahman Applicant Muhammad Fathurrahman bin Ammar Effendi Applicant Muhammad Shafiq bin Mansor Applicant

Case Significance

1. ) MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ BIN MANSOR 2. ) MUHAMMAD AIMAN BIN MAHAMAD 3. ) MUHAMMAD... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 15, 2025 (citation: ra-44-1-06-2025). The case was decided by Arik Sanusi bin Yeop Johari.

What was the outcome of 1. ) MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ BIN MANSOR 2. ) MUHAMMAD AIMAN BIN MAHAMAD 3. ) MUHAMMAD...?

1. ) MUHAMMAD SHAFIQ BIN MANSOR 2. ) MUHAMMAD AIMAN BIN MAHAMAD 3. ) MUHAMMAD... is a High Court decision dated June 15, 2025. The case was heard by Arik Sanusi bin Yeop Johari. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (1)

MY (1)
[2000] 6 MLJ 847

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (ra-44-1-06-2025)