NIK MOHD SUHAIMI BIN AHMAD GHAZALI v 1. ) Siti Fairuz Binti Shamsuri 2. ) Pang Teck Mai 3. ) Ameer Anuar Bin Minhad 4. ) Mohd Tharuzi Bin Mohd Nor 5. ) Dato' Abdul Razak Bin Musa 6. ) Syafinas Binti Shabudin 7. ) Rozana Binti Abdul Hadi 8. ) Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia (SPRM) 9. ) Kerajaan Malaysia

w-01imncvc-386-06-2024 Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) 18 June 2026 • W-01(IM)(NCvC)-386-06/2024

Catchwords

Learned High Court Judge (HCJ) allowed the Plaintiff’s claim on a cause of action of tort of abuse of process/malicious process but disallowed the claim for malicious prosecution against the Defendants - whether the Plaintiff should file Notice of Appeal or Notice of Cross Appeal against the dismissal of his claim under the tort of malicious prosecution - whether the cause of action based on tort of abuse of process/malicious process has been pleaded by the Plaintiff - whether the learned HCJ was right in extending the general tort of abuse of process/malicious process in civil process to a case of abuse of criminal process - whether the non objection by the Defendants of the admission of the documents is fatal to the Defendants’ case - whether the Plaintiff is entitled to claim general, special, exemplary and/or aggravated damages.

Judges (3)

Ahmad Kamal bin Md. Shahid Delivered Azhahari Kamal bin Ramli Coram Nadzarin bin Wok Nordin Coram

Parties (10)

Kerajaan Malaysia Respondent Suruhanjaya Pencegahan Rasuah Malaysia Respondent Ameer Anuar bin Minhad Respondent Dato' Abdul Razak bin Musa Respondent Mohd Tharuzi bin Mohd Nor Respondent Nik Mohd Suhaimi bin Ahmad Ghazali Appellant Pang Teck Mai Respondent Rozana binti Abdul Hadi Respondent Siti Fairuz binti Shamsuri Respondent Syafinas binti Shabudin Respondent

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (w-01imncvc-386-06-2024)