XXXX v PROTASCO BHD

w-02nccw-1459-09-2023 Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) 8 March 2026 • W-02(NCC)(W)-1459-09/2023 • 42 min read

7 cases cited (0 SG, 7 foreign)

Catchwords

Whether the broad grounds is the full grounds of judgment - Whether full grounds should be ignored since broad grounds delivered when judgment pronounced - Whether omissions and divergences between broad grounds and full grounds of judgment fatal - Whether particulars sufficiently pleaded for a fraud claim - Whether finding of fact on fraud and breach of fiduciary duty warrant interference

Judges (3)

Ahmad Fairuz bin Zainol Abidin Coram Choo Kah Sing Coram Ravinthran a/l Paramaguru Delivered

Counsel (12)

B H Lawrence & Co. Firm Cheah Teh & Su Firm C. Vignesh Kumar Counsel Appellant Chen Jia Ern Counsel Appellant Dato' Malik Imtiaz Sarwar Counsel Appellant How Chen Hee Counsel Respondent Joycelyn Teoh Counsel Respondent Lim Yvonne Counsel Appellant Peter Skelchy Counsel Respondent R. Jayasingam Counsel Appellant Rubanyah Sedopathy Counsel Appellant Tan Zhixin Counsel Respondent

Parties (1)

Protasco Bhd Respondent

Statutes Cited

Companies Act 1965 (Cap 777)

Court of Judicature Act 1964

s 3 s 71

Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 593)

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (7)

MY (7)

[1972] 1 MLJ 153 [1996] 3 CLJ 335 [2010] 9 CLJ 625 [2014] 7 MLJ 652 [2017] 5 CLJ 418 [2020] 12 MLJ 67 [2023] 3 MLJ 795

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (w-02nccw-1459-09-2023)