URBAN DOMAIN SDN. BHD. v 1. ) PINS OSC & MAINTENANCE SERVICES SDN BHD 2. ) PERAK INTEGRATED NETWORK SERVICES SDN BHD 3. ) XXXX
w-03imncc-70-07-2022 Court of Appeal (Mahkamah Rayuan) 6 December 2023 • W-03(IM)(NCC)-70-07/2022 • 20 min read
Catchwords
[38] Since we have allowed Appeal 69 and Appeal 70, the matter is remitted to the High Court for further Account and Inquiry regarding the liability period not covered in the Quantum Order. If the High Court determines that there is an additional Maintenance Fee payable by PINS to PINS OSC for this period, then an order must be issued by the High Court accordingly. [39] After hearing submissions on costs, we have fixed the costs at RM20,000.00 for each appeal, subject to allocatur
Judges (3)
Counsel (11)
Dennis Nik & Wong Firm Nethi & Saw Firm Dato' Bastian Vendargon Counsel Appellant Gene Anand Vendargon Counsel Appellant Leong Kwong Wah Counsel Appellant Michelle Teoh Counsel Respondent Owee Chia Ming Counsel Respondent Ranjit Singh Counsel Respondent Saw Wei Siang Counsel Respondent Villie Nethi Counsel Respondent Vincent Lim Seng Liang Counsel Appellant
Statutes Cited
Companies Act 1965 (Cap 777)
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (w-03imncc-70-07-2022)