Looi Kam Yong v Chambers of Firdaus
wa-11ancvc-31-05-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 29 April 2025 • WA-11ANCvC-31-05/2024 • 7 min read
11 cases cited
(0 SG, 11 foreign)
Catchwords
[1] This is an appeal by the Appellant against the decision of the Learned Magistrate that dismissed the Appellant’s application under Order 20 Rule 5 and/or Order 92 Rule 4 of the Rules of Court 2012 (ROC) to amend the Appellant’s Statement of Defence and Counterclaim (Defence and Counterclaim). [2] This Court finds that the Learned Magistrate has not erred in his decision when he dismissed the Defendant’s application. This Court agrees with the finding of facts and the determination of the law of the Learned Magistrate. In other words, the Learned Magistrate has not made any appealable error requiring appellate intervention. [3] Thus, there is no necessity to interfere with the findings of the Learned Magistrate. [4] In this regard, for all the reasons aforesaid, this Court finds that there is no merit in this appeal to warrant appellate intervention. [5] As such the appeal is dismissed with costs.
Judges (1)
Case Significance
Looi Kam Yong v Chambers of Firdaus is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated April 29, 2025 (citation: wa-11ancvc-31-05-2024). The case was decided by Suzana binti Muhamad Said.
Key issues: [3] Thus, there is no necessity to interfere with the findings of the Learned Magistrate..
What was the outcome of Looi Kam Yong v Chambers of Firdaus?
Looi Kam Yong v Chambers of Firdaus is a High Court decision dated April 29, 2025. The case was heard by Suzana binti Muhamad Said. See the full judgment for details.
Statutes Cited
Rules of Court 2012
Cases Cited (11)
MY (11)
[1959] MLJ 51 [2004] 4 CLJ 309 [2005] 2 MLJ 1 [2016] 2 MLJ 428 [2016] 4 CLJ 665 [2018] 2 CLJ 641 [2018] 2 MLJ 177 [2020] 10 CLJ 1 [2020] 12 MLJ 67 [2021] 3 MLJ 622 [2021] 4 CLJ 821
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-11ancvc-31-05-2024)