NOOR FAREKH BINTI MOHAMED KASSIM v BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD
Catchwords
Civil Procedure – Appeal – Competency of appeal – Whether appeal barred under s 28(1)(a) Courts of Judicature Act 1964 – Whether appeal raised questions of law notwithstanding quantum below RM10,000 – Natural justice – Adjournment – Failure to secure subpoenaed witness – Whether refusal to adjourn constituted denial of fair trial – Courts of Judicature Act 1964, s.28(1), & s.68(1)(a) – Rules of Court 2012, o.18 r.7, o.38 r.14, & o.55 rr.2, 3, & 4. Banking – Credit card facility – Unauthorised transactions – Whether bank in breach of contract or duty of care – Whether bank liable under Quincecare duty – Whether bank complied with Bank Negara Malaysia guidelines – Banker and customer relationship – Nature of duty – Whether fiduciary duty owed – Whether relationship governed by terms of agreement – Co-operative Societies Act 1993, s.7, s.8 & s.9 – Bank Kerjasama Rakyat Malaysia Berhad (Special Provisions) Act 1978, s.3 – Development Financial Institutions Act 2002, s.3 and the First Schedule.
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Case Significance
NOOR FAREKH BINTI MOHAMED KASSIM v BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 12, 2025 (citation: wa-11bm-1-09-2024). The case was decided by Yusrin Faidz bin Yusoff.
What was the outcome of NOOR FAREKH BINTI MOHAMED KASSIM v BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD?
NOOR FAREKH BINTI MOHAMED KASSIM v BANK KERJASAMA RAKYAT MALAYSIA BERHAD is a High Court decision dated June 12, 2025. The case was heard by Yusrin Faidz bin Yusoff. See the full judgment for details.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-11bm-1-09-2024)