BOOBALAN A/L KRISHNAN v SG ENTERTAINMENT & ADVERTISING

wa-12ancc-25-06-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 21 January 2026 • WA-12ANCC-25-06/2025 • 7 min read

1 cases cited (0 SG, 1 foreign)

Catchwords

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Setting aside judgment in default - Irregularity - Personal service - Cause papers were not personally served - Cause papers left in mailbox - Whether the process server identified the defendant - No verification of the defendant's identity - Defective service - Order 62, rule 3 of the Rules of Court 2012

Judges (1)

Elaine Yap Chin Gaik Delivered

Counsel (6)

Harjit Sandhu, Wan & Associates Firm Lakshmi Gandhi Nathan & Partners Firm Dev Chai Ming Shun Counsel Respondent Krishnan Counsel Appellant Satvinder Kaur a/p Harminder Singh Counsel Respondent Sundaresan Counsel Appellant

Parties (2)

Boobalan a/l Krishnan Appellant Sg Entertainment & Advertising Respondent

Case Significance

BOOBALAN A/L KRISHNAN v SG ENTERTAINMENT & ADVERTISING is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 21, 2026 (citation: wa-12ancc-25-06-2025). The case was decided by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik.

What was the outcome of BOOBALAN A/L KRISHNAN v SG ENTERTAINMENT & ADVERTISING?

BOOBALAN A/L KRISHNAN v SG ENTERTAINMENT & ADVERTISING is a High Court decision dated January 21, 2026. The case was heard by Elaine Yap Chin Gaik. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (1)

MY (1)

[1998] MLJU 398

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-12ancc-25-06-2025)