REN BIOMED SDN BHD v EUMAXCO HOLDING SDN BHD

wa-12ancvc-193-11-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 11 June 2025 • WA-12ANCvC-193-11/2024 • 6 min read

Catchwords

appeal by the Appellant against the decision of the learned Sessions Court Judge, which dismissed the Appellant’s application to set aside a writ of distress issued ex parte on 27 June 2024. These matters raise triable issues that go to the very foundation of the landlord-tenant relationship. Session Court failed to properly consider or address this evidence in her grounds of decision. This amounts to a material misdirection warranting appellate intervention. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed.

Judges (1)

Mahazan binti Mat Taib Delivered

Counsel (7)

David Chau & Artika Firm Manjit Singh Sachdev Mohammad Radzi & Partners Firm Chris Wong Jun Wei Counsel Respondent Lau Yi Leong Counsel Appellant Tan Shao Jia Counsel Respondent Toh Chia Hua Counsel Appellant Wee Chiat Khee Counsel Appellant

Parties (2)

EUMAXCO HOLDING Sdn Bhd Respondent REN BIOMED Sdn Bhd Appellant

Case Significance

REN BIOMED SDN BHD v EUMAXCO HOLDING SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 11, 2025 (citation: wa-12ancvc-193-11-2024). The case was decided by Mahazan binti Mat Taib.

What was the outcome of REN BIOMED SDN BHD v EUMAXCO HOLDING SDN BHD?

REN BIOMED SDN BHD v EUMAXCO HOLDING SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated June 11, 2025. The case was heard by Mahazan binti Mat Taib. See the full judgment for details.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-12ancvc-193-11-2024)