PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE MALAYSIA BERHAD v 1. ) MARIANA BINTI MUHAMMAD 2. ) MOHAMMAD SELIM BIN MAKBUL AHAMAD 3. ) MUHAMMAD ARHAM MIKHAIL (adalah budak bawah umur yang menuntut melalui Ibu yang sah, Mariana Binti Muhammad)

wa-12bncc-20-07-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 4 February 2024 • WA-12BNCC-20-07/2023 • 13 min read

3 cases cited (0 SG, 3 foreign)

Catchwords

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Appeal - Appellate intervention - Reluctance to disturb findings of fact - Whether trial judge misdirected herself in assessment of evidence - Whether lack of judicial appreciation of evidence - Whether trial judge misdirected herself in law - Whether appellate intervention warranted EVIDENCE: Allegation of forgery of signatures - Party bearing burden of proof - Evidence Act 1950, s 103

Judges (1)

Adlin binti Abdul Majid Delivered

Counsel (5)

Dennis Mahen.R & Aida Firm Shearn Delamore & Co. Firm Denise Choo Counsel Appellant Mahendren Naidu Counsel Respondent SY Liew Counsel Appellant

Parties (4)

PRUDENTIAL ASSURANCE MALAYSIA BERHAD Appellant Mariana binti Muhammad Respondent Mohammad Selim bin Makbul Ahamad Respondent Muhammad Arham Mikhail (adalah Budak Bawah Umur Yang Menuntut Melalui Ibu Yang Sah, Mariana binti Muhammad) Respondent

Cases Cited (3)

MY (3)

[2003] 2 MLJ 97 [2005] MLJ 712 [2014] 1 MLJ 562

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-12bncc-20-07-2023)