JURUPRO SDN BHD v KKIBS SDN BHD

wa-12bncc-24-09-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 23 January 2025 • WA-12BNCC-24-09/2024 • 12 min read

Catchwords

The finding that there was a valid contract between the Plaintiff and the 1st Defendant is contrary to the evidence produced before the Court - no evidence that the Plaintiff had dealt with the 1st Defendant at all regarding the sale and purchase of the 15,000 boxes of Nitrile Glove - 1st Defendant was not even a company carrying on the business of selling nitrile glove and never made any offer to sell 15,000 boxes of Nitrile Glove to the Plaintiff - there was no intention to create legal relation - Proforma Invoice and the Receipt/Delivery Order were never admitted as exhibits at the trial - both the Proforma Invoice and the Receipt /Delivery Order were indeed forgeries – existence of an agent-principal relationship between 2nd Defendant and 1st Defendant was never pleaded by the Plaintiff - no evidence adduced before the Court at the trial to support the Plaintiff’s contention that the 2nd Defendant was acting as agent of the 1st Defendant - appeal is allowed with costs.

Judges (1)

Ong Chee Kwan Delivered

Counsel (6)

Abdul Rahim & Co. Firm Low & Partners Firm C. K. Wai Counsel Appellant Derek Chin Counsel Appellant Fatin Dalila Binti Aripin Counsel Respondent Nik Zamzani Binti Nik Ibrahim Counsel Respondent

Parties (2)

JURUPRO Sdn Bhd Appellant KKIBS Sdn Bhd Respondent

Case Significance

JURUPRO SDN BHD v KKIBS SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 23, 2025 (citation: wa-12bncc-24-09-2024). The case was decided by Ong Chee Kwan.

What was the outcome of JURUPRO SDN BHD v KKIBS SDN BHD?

JURUPRO SDN BHD v KKIBS SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated January 23, 2025. The case was heard by Ong Chee Kwan. See the full judgment for details.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-12bncc-24-09-2024)