SINERJUTA SDN BHD v 1. ) WYMAN KANG ENG KIA 2. ) THANARAJ LETCHUMANAN

wa-12bncvc-151-12-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 21 September 2025 • WA-12BNCvC-151-12/2024 • 10 min read

3 cases cited (0 SG, 3 foreign)

Catchwords

Misrepresentation – Evidence of misrepresentation must be adduced by each and every plaintiff – Failure to adduce evidence of misrepresentation fatal – Sessions Court erred in allowing claim by 149 other persons in purported representative action who failed to adduce evidence – Only the 1st Plaintiff who testified to prove misrepresentation is entitled to judgment for General Damages – Act of deceit to make a representation with full knowledge that it would be impossible to fulfill the representation – S.37 Specific Relief Act 1950 – Court empowered to order both rescission and damages to be assessed and paid

Judges (1)

Gan Techiong Delivered

Counsel (4)

Kevindran & Co. Firm Mathews Hun Lachimanan Firm A. Kevindran Counsel Respondent Tina Francis Counsel Appellant

Parties (3)

SINERJUTA Sdn Bhd Appellant Thanaraj Letchumanan Respondent Wyman Kang Eng Kia Respondent

Case Significance

SINERJUTA SDN BHD v 1. ) WYMAN KANG ENG KIA 2. ) THANARAJ LETCHUMANAN is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 21, 2025 (citation: wa-12bncvc-151-12-2024). The case was decided by Gan Techiong.

What was the outcome of SINERJUTA SDN BHD v 1. ) WYMAN KANG ENG KIA 2. ) THANARAJ LETCHUMANAN?

SINERJUTA SDN BHD v 1. ) WYMAN KANG ENG KIA 2. ) THANARAJ LETCHUMANAN is a High Court decision dated September 21, 2025. The case was heard by Gan Techiong. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Specific Relief Act 1950 (Cap 137)

Cases Cited (3)

MY (3)

[1990] 3 MLJ 427 [2005] 2 MLJ 1 [2011] 5 MLJ 309

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-12bncvc-151-12-2024)