Oasis Garden Development Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Ranner Wolfgang 2. ) Leong Soo Leng

wa-12bncvc-61-05-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 20 March 2025 • WA-12BNCvC-61-05/2024 • 21 min read

15 cases cited (0 SG, 15 foreign)

Catchwords

[1] This is an appeal by the Appellant against the decision of the Sessions Court (SC) that allowed the Respondent’s claim. [2] This Court has allowed the appeal in part. Only prayer 1(c) is allowed pertaining to the defect inspection cost of RM3710.00. The reasons are as deliberated. [3] For convenience, the parties are referred in their respective capacity at the Sessions Court. The Appellant is referred to as the Defendant and the Respondents are referred to as the Plaintiffs. [4] This Court finds that the appellate intervention is warranted only on the issue of the inspection report. As such, the appeal is allowed in part only. The rest of the Order of the SCJ is affirmed.

Judges (1)

Suzana binti Muhamad Said Delivered

Counsel (5)

Justin Voon Chooi & Wing Firm Yap Siew Yee & Co. Firm Justin Voon Counsel Appellant Victor Pang Counsel Appellant Yap Yoon Jan Counsel Respondent

Parties (3)

Oasis Garden Development Sdn Bhd Appellant Leong Soo Leng Respondent Ranner Wolfgang Respondent

Case Significance

Oasis Garden Development Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Ranner Wolfgang 2. ) Leong Soo Leng is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 20, 2025 (citation: wa-12bncvc-61-05-2024). The case was decided by Suzana binti Muhamad Said.

Key issues: [1] This is an appeal by the Appellant against the decision of the Sessions Court (SC) that allowed the Respondent’s claim..

What was the outcome of Oasis Garden Development Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Ranner Wolfgang 2. ) Leong Soo Leng?

Oasis Garden Development Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Ranner Wolfgang 2. ) Leong Soo Leng is a High Court decision dated March 20, 2025. The case was heard by Suzana binti Muhamad Said. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Evidence Act

s 114(g) s 90A

Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)

s 90A

Singapore Evidence Act

s 35

Cases Cited (15)

UK (1)

[1947] AC 484

MY (14)

[1977] 1 MLJ 180 [1987] 2 MLJ 601 [1991] 1 MLJ 1 [1996] 1 AMR 839 [1996] 1 MLJ 233 [1996] 2 CLJ 611 [2004] 4 CLJ 309 [2004] 7 CLJ 443 [2005] 2 MLJ 1 [2010] 9 CLJ 785 [2012] 9 MLJ 854 [2015] 2 CLJ 453 [2015] 2 MLJ 441 [2021] 4 MLRH 21

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-12bncvc-61-05-2024)