1. ) MAZLAN BIN CHIK 2. ) MOHD AZRANI BIN ABD RAHIM 3. ) FARID KHAN BIN KHAN MOHAMAD 4. ) NASAR KHAN BIN SEPOR RAHMAN 5. ) MOHAMED ZARSHAD BIN SEPOR RAHMAN 6. ) MOHD TAMAM BIN IDRIS 7. ) NOR ZAIDI BIN ABU SHARI 8. ) ROHANA BINTI AHMAD 9. ) FATIMAH BINTI HUSIN 10. ) SALMAH BINTI NOORDIN 11. ) MARIAM BINTI AHMAD 12. ) ZUBAIDAH BINTI RAAKZI 13. ) SAFIAH BINTI AHMAD 14. ) ZARIN BINTI ABDUL KARIM 15. ) DZAR DZAN BINTI MOHAMMED TAHIB v DATUK BANDAR KUALA LUMPUR

wa-12bncvc-96-08-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 5 August 2025 • WA-12BNCvC-96-08/2024 • 25 min read

28 cases cited (0 SG, 28 foreign)

Catchwords

Whether the SCJ erred in law and in fact in her findings that in the Plaintiffs’ pleadings, there is no agreement against the D1 in the 26.6.2018 Meeting - Whether the SCJ erred in law and in fact in her findings in relation to the 26.6.2018 Meeting and the Minutes of Meeting prepared by the Plaintiffs - Whether the SCJ erred in law and in fact in her findings that res judicata applies to the Plaintiffs’ claims in this suit

Judges (1)

Aliza binti Sulaiman Delivered

Counsel (7)

Mazwan Dee Nasar & Shima Firm Yusfarizal Aziz & Zaid Firm Mohamad Zaid bin Daud@Daud Yatimee Counsel Respondent Mohd Munzeer Bin Zainul Abidin Counsel Respondent Muaz Zafar Counsel Appellant Muhammad Ali Redha bin Ahmad Rashidi Counsel Respondent Nasar Khan bin Mirbas Khan Counsel Appellant

Parties (16)

Datuk Bandar Kuala Lumpur Respondent Dzar Dzan binti Mohammed Tahib Appellant Farid Khan bin Khan Mohamad Appellant Fatimah binti Husin Appellant Mariam binti Ahmad Appellant Mazlan bin Chik Appellant Mohamed Zarshad bin Sepor Rahman Appellant Mohd Azrani bin Abd Rahim Appellant Mohd Tamam bin Idris Appellant Nasar Khan bin Sepor Rahman Appellant Nor Zaidi bin Abu Shari Appellant Rohana binti Ahmad Appellant Safiah binti Ahmad Appellant Salmah binti Noordin Appellant Zarin binti Abdul Karim Appellant Zubaidah binti Raakzi Appellant

Case Significance

1. ) MAZLAN BIN CHIK 2. ) MOHD AZRANI BIN ABD RAHIM 3. ) FARID KHAN BIN KHAN ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated August 5, 2025 (citation: wa-12bncvc-96-08-2024). The case was decided by Aliza binti Sulaiman.

What was the outcome of 1. ) MAZLAN BIN CHIK 2. ) MOHD AZRANI BIN ABD RAHIM 3. ) FARID KHAN BIN KHAN ...?

1. ) MAZLAN BIN CHIK 2. ) MOHD AZRANI BIN ABD RAHIM 3. ) FARID KHAN BIN KHAN ... is a High Court decision dated August 5, 2025. The case was heard by Aliza binti Sulaiman. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Courts of Judicature Act 1964

s 29

Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)

s 101

Cases Cited (28)

MY (28)

[1984] 2 MLJ 165 [1995] 2 MLJ 770 [2003] 2 CLJ 19 [2003] 2 MLJ 97 [2004] 2 MLJ 31 [2004] 4 CLJ 309 [2005] 2 MLJ 1 [2007] 5 MLJ 697 [2008] 2 CLJ 284 [2008] 2 MLJ 87 [2009] 6 CLJ 626 [2009] 6 MLJ 1 [2010] 3 CLJ 377 [2010] 3 MLJ 509 [2010] 9 CLJ 785 [2012] 4 MLJ 149 [2012] 6 MLJ 1 [2012] MLJU 275 [2013] 4 MLJ 693 [2015] 2 MLJ 441 [2016] 2 MLJ 428 [2017] 5 CLJ 58 [2019] 10 CLJ 731 [2020] 12 MLJ 67 [2022] MLJU 1553 [2023] 4 MLJ 1 [2024] MLJU 2399 [2025] AMEJ 1247

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-12bncvc-96-08-2024)