SURIAMURTHY @ SOURIMUTHU A/L DORASAMY v KETUA PENGARAH PERTUBUHAN KESELAMATAN SOSIAL

wa-16-20-07-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 28 January 2026 • WA-16-20-07/2025 • 17 min read

22 cases cited (0 SG, 22 foreign)

Catchwords

The length of, and reasons for - the delay - The merits of the appeal - Prejudice to the Respondent - the Appellant has failed to – (a) allude to some facts or law in his affidavit to show at least an arguable case; (b) identify the substantive question of law to be referred to this court pursuant to the mandatory requirements of s 91 of Act 4; and (c) provide sufficient material for this court to consider whether the appeal has merits.

Judges (1)

Aliza binti Sulaiman Delivered

Counsel (5)

Radzi Sheikh Ahmad & Sachpal Firm Zain & Co. Firm Rishima Sudhakaran Counsel Respondent Sharmini Durai Counsel Respondent Syahirah Binti Suhaimy Counsel Appellant

Parties (2)

KETUA PENGARAH PERTUBUHAN KESELAMATAN SOSIAL Respondent Suriamurthy @ Sourimuthu a/l Dorasamy Appellant

Statutes Cited

Employees Social Security Act 1969

s 91

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (22)

UK (1)

[1954] 1 WLR 1489

MY (21)

[1971] 1 MLJ 167 [1981] 2 MLJ 194 [1991] 3 MLJ 208 [1996] 2 MLJ 54 [1996] 3 MLJ 85 [1999] 2 MLJ 67752 [2000] 5 CLJ 71 [2001] 3 MLJ 491 [2002] MLJU 643 [2003] 3 CLJ 791 [2003] 4 MLJ 409 [2003] 4 MLJ 465 [2014] 5 MLJ 535 [2015] MLJU 1805 [2019] MLJU 1170 [2019] MLJU 435 [2020] MLJU 1312 [2021] MLJU 2882 [2021] MLJU 612 [2023] MLJU 17 [2025] MLJU 101

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-16-20-07-2025)