CRCC MALAYSIA BERHAD v 1. ) M101 ENTITY SDN BHD 2. ) M101 HOLDINGS SDN BHD 3. ) YAP TING HAU, DATO' 4. ) DATIN CHAN HENG SI

wa-22c-70-07-2020 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 14 May 2024 • WA-22C-70-07/2020 • 65 min read
8 cases cited (0 SG, 8 foreign)

Catchwords

Whether the Plaintiff failed to renew the PB - Whether the Plaintiff failed to provide the Line of Credit - Whether the Plaintiff wrongfully suspended works - Whether D1’s determination of the Plaintiff’s employment is lawful - Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to its claim for work done in the sum of RM37,694,650.97 - Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to its claim for variation in the sum of RM10,426,534.54 - Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to its claim for customised material in the sum of RM2,318,520.38 - Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to its claim for contractual interest in the sum of RM2,484,883.72 (calculated as at 24.7.2020) - Whether the Plaintiff is entitled to its claim for Loss and Expense in the sum of RM9,000,000.00

Judges (1)

Aliza binti Sulaiman Delivered

Counsel (13)

Ho Partnership Firm Izral Partnership Firm S Ravenesan Firm Sanjay Mohan Firm Adam Lee Leong Soon Counsel Plaintiff Bryan Ho Jiann Yau Counsel Defendant Chau Yen Loong Counsel Defendant Kimberly Ng Wenn Mei Counsel Defendant Naveennesan a/l Sivanesan Counsel Defendant Nicholas Navaron Anak Chula Counsel Defendant Ravenesan a/l Sivanesan Counsel Defendant Sanjay Mohanasundram Counsel Plaintiff Siew Kai Hwei Counsel Defendant

Parties (5)

CRCC MALAYSIA BERHAD Plaintiff M101 ENTITY Sdn Bhd Defendant M101 HOLDINGS Sdn Bhd Defendant Datin Chan Heng Si Defendant Yap Ting Hau, Dato' Defendant

Statutes Cited

Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)
s 471
Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)
s 102

Cases Cited (8)

MY (8)
[2009] 4 MLJ 575 [2011] 7 CLJ 442 [2016] 7 CLJ 275 [2016] MLJU 622 [2017] 3 MLJ 668 [2017] 4 MLJ 697 [2019] MLJU 519 [2020] 3 MLJ 704

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22c-70-07-2020)