KEHZEN ENGINEERING SDN BHD v SETIA PRECAST SDN BHD

wa-22c-90-12-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 25 September 2025 • WA-22C-90-12/2023 • 23 min read

14 cases cited (0 SG, 14 foreign)

Catchwords

Enclosure 345. Administration of Justice & Civil Procedure: Whether the recusal application can be made under Order 57 Rule 1 of ROC 2012 for transfer of proceeding to another construction court - Correct test to be applied for recusal of judges- Whether the Affidavit discloses grounds evidencing "real danger of bias" test- Whether Judicial Commissioner ought to recuse himself from hearing present matter on the basis of professional association with party’s counsel

Judges (1)

Rajes Raghavji Delivered

Counsel (8)

Benjamin Dawson Firm Zul Rafique & Partners Firm Agesh Krishendra Jayaratnam Counsel Defendant Kevin Prakash Counsel Plaintiff Koh San Tee Counsel Plaintiff Nezwan Helmy Hamzah Counsel Defendant Tan Hui Ru Counsel Plaintiff Tan Sze Ting Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

KEHZEN ENGINEERING Sdn Bhd Plaintiff SETIA PRECAST Sdn Bhd Defendant

Case Significance

KEHZEN ENGINEERING SDN BHD v SETIA PRECAST SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated September 25, 2025 (citation: wa-22c-90-12-2023). The case was decided by Rajes Raghavji.

What was the outcome of KEHZEN ENGINEERING SDN BHD v SETIA PRECAST SDN BHD?

KEHZEN ENGINEERING SDN BHD v SETIA PRECAST SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated September 25, 2025. The case was heard by Rajes Raghavji. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Federal Constitution

Art 124

Cases Cited (14)

UK (3)

[1993] AC 646 [2000] 2 WLR 870 [2006] 1 WLR 1163

MY (11)

[1999] 3 CLJ 65 [2001] 2 MLJ 481 [2006] 1 CLJ 577 [2006] 2 MLJ 293 [2011] 3 CLJ 294 [2011] 6 CLJ 649 [2013] 10 CLJ 505 [2016] 9 MLJ 584 [2017] 3 MLJ 350 [2019] 9 CLJ 153 [2020] 5 MLJ 220

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22c-90-12-2023)