1. ) CALIPH CONSULTANCY GROUP SDN. BHD. 2. ) MOHD HAMZAVI BIN MD ZAIN v 1. ) ONE TWO ONE ADVISOR SDN. BHD. 2. ) QAIZER CONSULTANCY SDN. BHD.

wa-22ip-18-02-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 10 June 2025 • WA-22IP-18-02/2024 • 18 min read
3 cases cited (0 SG, 3 foreign)

Catchwords

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Orders - Difference between confidentiality order and protective order - Whether scope of application to protect documents is too wide - Whether protection is necessary in view of the nature of documents

Judges (1)

Adlin binti Abdul Majid Delivered

Counsel (8)

Rahmat Lim & Partners Firm Suren Subra Law Chambers Firm Azra Hazirah Tadwin binti Tadad Counsel Plaintiff Christie Soosay Nathan Counsel Plaintiff Jack Yow Counsel Defendant Lee Ji Kean Counsel Defendant Melvin Ng Yet Ting Counsel Defendant S. Surendran Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (4)

CALIPH CONSULTANCY GROUP Sdn Bhd Plaintiff ONE TWO ONE ADVISOR Sdn Bhd Defendant QAIZER CONSULTANCY Sdn Bhd Defendant Mohd Hamzavi bin Md Zain Plaintiff

Case Significance

1. ) CALIPH CONSULTANCY GROUP SDN. BHD. 2. ) MOHD HAMZAVI BIN MD ZAIN v 1. ) ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 10, 2025 (citation: wa-22ip-18-02-2024). The case was decided by Adlin binti Abdul Majid.

What was the outcome of 1. ) CALIPH CONSULTANCY GROUP SDN. BHD. 2. ) MOHD HAMZAVI BIN MD ZAIN v 1. ) ...?

1. ) CALIPH CONSULTANCY GROUP SDN. BHD. 2. ) MOHD HAMZAVI BIN MD ZAIN v 1. ) ... is a High Court decision dated June 10, 2025. The case was heard by Adlin binti Abdul Majid. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (3)

MY (3)
[2017] 2 MLJ 396 [2020] 11 MLJ 141 [2025] 9 MLJ 379

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ip-18-02-2024)