1. ) RESTORAN NAIZ ALI SDN. BHD. 2. ) RIZAL ALI BIN NAIZALI Berniaga sebagai Pakeeza Restaurant & Catering v 1. ) HOUSE OF PAKEEZA SDN. BHD. 2. ) MOHAMED AMIN BIN MOHAMED SHABIR 3. ) MOHD FIRDAUS RAMZAN BIN MOHAMED AMIN

wa-22ip-40-05-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 31 March 2026 • WA-22IP-40-05/2024 • 8 min read

3 cases cited (0 SG, 3 foreign)

Catchwords

to order 18 rule 19 of the Rules of Court 2012-to strike out the plaintiffs’ suit on the ground of duplicity of proceedings-Order 4 rule 1(1) of ROC-the suits are capable of being consolidated on the grounds that the rights to relief claimed arise out of the same transaction and/or series of transactions and further by reason of the aforesaid two factors it is desirable that an order for consolidation may be made-allowed a consolidation as the two actions involved the same plaintiffs and substantively the same defendants and involved common questions of facts-an application for two actions to be heard together as they involved similar issues of fact and liability

Judges (1)

Leong Wai Hong Delivered

Counsel (9)

Azmi & Associates Firm Suren Subra Law Chambers Firm Ammera Hadi Counsel Plaintiff Izzat Asyraf Zamri Counsel Plaintiff Izzati Syahirah Counsel Plaintiff Nur Syafiqah Counsel Defendant S. Surendran Counsel Defendant Siti Noorhazerah Counsel Defendant Sri Aisyah Counsel Defendant

Parties (5)

HOUSE OF PAKEEZA Sdn Bhd Defendant RESTORAN NAIZ ALI Sdn Bhd Plaintiff RIZAL ALI BIN NAIZALI BERNIAGA SEBAGAI PAKEEZA RESTAURANT & CATERING Plaintiff Mohamed Amin bin Mohamed Shabir Defendant Mohd Firdaus Ramzan bin Mohamed Amin Defendant

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (3)

MY (3)

[1973] 1 MLJ 31 [1989] 2 MLJ 119 [2007] 8 MLJ 277

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ip-40-05-2024)