NUEMERA (M) SDN BHD v 1. ) MOHAMED SHIHAB BIN KUNHI MOHAMED 2. ) ANUJ SINGH 3. ) MARCUS A/L FRANCIS 4. ) NORLIAH BINTI A P KUNHIBAVA 5. ) JAMEEL AHMAD 6. ) CIS INNOVATIONS SDN BHD 7. ) ILRON SDN BHD 8. ) TROIKA CONSULT SDN BHD

wa-22ip-43-05-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 5 March 2026 • WA-22IP-43-05/2025 • 45 min read
10 cases cited (0 SG, 10 foreign)

Catchwords

CIVIL PROCEDURE - Application to strike out certain portions of the Defendants' pleadings, affidavits, and written submissions — Whether the specific impugned portions are irrelevant and immaterial to any issue in this action — Whether it amounts to being scandalous, irrelevant, prejudicial or oppressive — application allowed with costs — Order 18 rule 19(1)(b), (c) and/or (d), Order 41 rule 6 of the Rules of Court 2012

Practice Areas

CIVIL PROCEDURE

Judges (1)

Edwin Paramjothy a/l Michael Muniandy Delivered

Counsel (12)

Elizabeth Lau Firm Preakas & Partner Firm Zaid Ibrahim Suflan T H Liew & Partners Firm Adeline Loh Qiao Ping Counsel Defendant Divesh Ramani Counsel Plaintiff Elizabeth Lau Counsel Defendant Gerald Samuel Counsel Defendant Hugo Ng Counsel Defendant Liew Teck Huat Counsel Plaintiff Ong Kang Nyong Counsel Plaintiff Preakas Sampunathan Counsel Defendant Sufiah Yusoff Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (9)

CIS INNOVATIONS Sdn Bhd Defendant ILRON Sdn Bhd Defendant NUEMERA Sdn Bhd Plaintiff TROIKA CONSULT Sdn Bhd Defendant Anuj Singh Defendant Jameel Ahmad Defendant Marcus a/l Francis Defendant Mohamed Shihab bin Kunhi Mohamed Defendant Norliah binti A P Kunhibava Defendant

Statutes Cited

Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)
Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (10)

MY (10)
[1993] 3 MLJ 36 [1999] MLJU 125 [2001] 4 AMR 4807 [2001] MLJU 566 [2011] 2 MLJ 192 [2013] 3 MLJ 235 [2015] 3 MLJ 364 [2019] MLJU 2048 [2025] AMEJ 1249 [2025] MLJU 2539

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ip-43-05-2025)