1. ) MK1 DEVELOPMENT (3) SDN. BHD. 2. ) GT-MAX CONSTRUCTION SDN. BHD. v 1. ) PUBLIC BANK BERHAD 2. ) PUBLIC ISLAMIC BANK BERHAD
Catchwords
Civil Procedure — Summary judgment — Determination of question of law or construction of document — Determination of breach of statutory duty — Whether issue of whether the defendant had breached the statutory duty was a question of fact, or question of law or construction — Ambit of O 14A — Rules of Court 2012. O.14A — Land Development Act 1956. s.3(1) — Bills of Exchange Act 1949, s.85 — Financial Services Act 2013, s.48 — Islamic Financial Services Act 2013 — Malaysia Anti-Corruption Corporation Act 2009, s.17A — Money Services Business Act 2011, s.36 & s.74 — Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001, s.16A. Civil Procedure — Discovery — Inspection of documents — Whether order for production justified — Whether necessary for disposing matter fairly or for saving costs — Whether merely fishing for evidence — Whether order would be unduly oppressive — Whether documents in possession, custody and power of opponent — Rules of Court 2012, O 24 r 3, r5, r12, r 13, — Courts of Judicature Act 1964, s 25(2) & Paragraph 14 of the Schedule.
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Case Significance
1. ) MK1 DEVELOPMENT (3) SDN. BHD. 2. ) GT-MAX CONSTRUCTION SDN. BHD. v 1. ) ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 15, 2025 (citation: wa-22m-45-01-2025). The case was decided by Yusrin Faidz bin Yusoff.
What was the outcome of 1. ) MK1 DEVELOPMENT (3) SDN. BHD. 2. ) GT-MAX CONSTRUCTION SDN. BHD. v 1. ) ...?
1. ) MK1 DEVELOPMENT (3) SDN. BHD. 2. ) GT-MAX CONSTRUCTION SDN. BHD. v 1. ) ... is a High Court decision dated June 15, 2025. The case was heard by Yusrin Faidz bin Yusoff. See the full judgment for details.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-22m-45-01-2025)