SURIA LABS DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD v BAI YANG INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP LIMITED

wa-22ncc-126-03-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 24 March 2025 • WA-22NCC-126-03/2023 • 27 min read

Catchwords

Judgment after trial – Contractual disputes under the Service Agreement (“SA”) to provide software development services – Claims for outstanding sums – The Defendant’s witness was not privy to the communication between the Defendant and the Plaintiff at the material times – Evidence unrebutted will be sufficient to discharge the legal burden needed to meet the cause of action. The Defendant led no evidence to rebut Plaintiff’s testimonies – Nowhere in the SA did it state that the website was for gambling or an online casino gaming platform that would be operated from Malaysia, Section 24 – Contracts Act 1950. Court ordered the outstanding sums to be paid with the interest thereon by the Defendant to the Plaintiff.

Judges (1)

Ong Chee Kwan Delivered

Counsel (6)

Liza Khan Chambers Firm Phee, Chen & Ung Firm Frankie Tan Kah Hian Counsel Plaintiff Norliza binti Rasool Khan Counsel Plaintiff Ung Chirt Kye Counsel Defendant Yong Li Tzer Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

BAI YANG INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP LIMITED Defendant SURIA LABS DEVELOPMENT Sdn Bhd Plaintiff

Case Significance

SURIA LABS DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD v BAI YANG INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP LIMITED is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 24, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncc-126-03-2023). The case was decided by Ong Chee Kwan.

What was the outcome of SURIA LABS DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD v BAI YANG INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP LIMITED?

SURIA LABS DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD v BAI YANG INFRASTRUCTURE GROUP LIMITED is a High Court decision dated March 24, 2025. The case was heard by Ong Chee Kwan. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Contracts Act 1950 (Cap 136)

s 24

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncc-126-03-2023)