BANK PEMBANGUNAN MALAYSIA BERHAD v 1. ) Sidqi Ahmad Said Bin Ahmad 2. ) Shailen A/l Popatlal 3. ) Wan Alias Bin Wan Ngah 4. ) Roslina Binti Ibrahim 5. ) Abdul Wahid Bin Abdul Ghani 6. ) Mohd Radzi Bin Mohamed 7. ) Muhammad Shazhakim Bin Shazarul Hisham 8. ) Shaza Arina Binti Shazarul Hisham 9. ) Mustafa Ali Zaminali Sayed 10. ) Wong Chee Keong 11. ) Abd. Hadi Bin Abd. Majid 12. ) Tunku Mazlina Binti Tunku Abd Aziz 13. ) Ranjeet Singh Sidhu 14. ) Noorusa Adah Binti Othman 15. ) PANEAGLE HOLDIN...

wa-22ncc-264-06-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 2 December 2024 • WA-22NCC-264-06/2022 • 56 min read
35 cases cited (0 SG, 35 foreign)

Catchwords

CIVIL PROCEDURE: Discovery – Third party discovery – Application under Order 24 Rule 7A of Rules of Court 2012 and section 7 of Bankers' Books (Evidence) Act 1949 – Discovery against banks for banking records – Whether discovery necessary for fair disposal of proceedings – Whether temporal gap between loan disbursement and payments precludes discovery – Whether letters of undertaking bar subsequent discovery applications – Whether R&M findings provide sufficient evidentiary foundation – Whether discovery constitutes fishing expedition – Whether scope of documents sought appropriate – Prima facie case of fraud – Asset tracing and preservation BANKING LAW: Banker's books – Inspection and copying of entries – Application under section 7 of Bankers' Books (Evidence) Act 1949 – Definition of banker's books – Purposive interpretation with updating approach – Modern banking products and facilities – Whether ATM cards, online banking and mobile application facilities fall within banker's books – Technological advances in record-keeping FRAUD: Asset tracing – Fraudulent disbursement of loan funds – Misappropriation through fictitious payment vouchers – Discovery to trace movement of funds – Whether payments to third parties constitute fraud – Concealment of true recipients through false documentation – Systematic discrepancies between payment vouchers and actual recipients – Prima facie case of fraud for discovery purposes EQUITY: Proprietary claims – Tracing of misappropriated funds – Equitable right to follow money – Discovery to locate and preserve assets – Real prospect of asset location and preservation – Breach of banking confidentiality justified by fraud – Bankers Trust principle application

Judges (1)

Parties (33)

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (35)

UK (1)
[1892] 2 QB 511
MY (34)
[1988] 3 MLJ 348 [2001] MLJU 638 [2005] 3 CLJ 793 [2008] 1 MLJ 623 [2009] 2 MLJ 672 [2011] 1 CLJ 491 [2011] 1 MLJ 752 [2013] 2 MLJ 915 [2013] 5 MLJ 1 [2013] 6 AMR 613 [2013] 9 CLJ 941 [2014] 1 MLJ 27 [2014] 3 MLJ 672 [2015] 2 CLJ 1062 [2015] 5 MLJ 619 [2015] MLJU 2100 [2016] 3 MLJ 122 [2017] 4 MLJ 21 [2017] 5 MLJ 63 [2017] MLJU 273 [2018] 2 MLJ 133 [2018] MLJU 196 [2020] 12 MLJ 54 [2020] MLJU 1470 [2020] MLJU 554 [2021] 4 MLJ 418 [2021] 5 CLJ 170 [2021] 5 MLJ 688 [2023] 3 MLJ 764 [2023] 6 MLJ 243 [2023] MLJU 63 [2024] 6 MLJ 68 [2024] MLJU 3039 [2025] MLJU 4705

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncc-264-06-2022)