1. ) MALAYSIA AUTOMOTIVE, ROBOTICS AND IOT INSTITUTE 2. ) A2Z TECHNOLOGY SDN. BHD. v 1. ) DATO TS MOHAMAD MADANI BIN SAHARI 2. ) ASPIRE KNOWLEDGE SDN. BHD. 3. ) SANDOSH A/L J N ANANDAN 4. ) VASUDEVAN A/L ARUMUGAM 5. ) MUGILAN KRISHNARAJAH A/L KRISHNARAJAH 6. ) PROFITABLE WORKS PLT 7. ) MATIN NAZIR JOHANABAS BIN ROSMAN 8. ) MATIN FAYZAL JOHANABAS 9. ) WENLE HOLDINGS SDN. BHD. 10. ) SU SEONG YEEN 11. ) TAN OOI JIN 12. ) AHMAD ASYRAF HAZWAN BIN UZER 13. ) MOHD SAZALI MOHAMED AMIN 14. ) KUHAN ARU...

wa-22ncc-442-07-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 12 December 2024 • WA-22NCC-442-07/2024 • 20 min read
6 cases cited (0 SG, 6 foreign)

Catchwords

Injunction – Claim premised on fraud – Ex-parte order was granted – Inter parte application for proprietary and Mareva injunction – Application to set aside the ex-parte order - Order 29 Rules of Court 2012 – Whether requirements for Mareva injunction satisfied– whether there was real risk assets would be dissipated – failure to demonstrate serious issues to be tried - unexplained delay in filing the applications – inter parte injunctions application dismissed – set aside application granted.

Judges (1)

Ong Chee Kwan Delivered

Counsel (29)

KH Wong & Co Firm Kee Sern, Siu & Huey Firm Khairul Fadzli Amin & Co. Firm Moideen & Max Firm Nurainie Haziqah & Co. Firm Rosli Dahlan Saravana Partnership Firm Rozana Segran & Co. Firm Sandosh Anandan Firm Shook Lin & Bok Firm The Chambers of Shamsul Qamar Firm Austen Emmanuel Pereira Counsel Plaintiff Che Aidil Erfan bin Che Afero Counsel Defendant Chow Chen Yie Counsel Plaintiff Dato' Prem Ramachandran Counsel Defendant Emily Chua Yan Feng Counsel Defendant Harjoth Singh a/l Darshan Singh Counsel Defendant Hazel Lim Pey Tsyr Counsel Third Party Julian Ch'ng Wei Shen Counsel Defendant Muhamad Haziq Areef bin Azlee Counsel Defendant Muhammad Faisal bin Moideen Counsel Defendant Muhd Fadzli bin Muhd Yusoff Counsel Defendant Nicole Wan Yee Herng Counsel Intervener Nur Amirah bt Iberahim Counsel Defendant Pannirselvam Mannar Counsel Defendant Poh Jun Yang Counsel Defendant V.S Viswanathan Counsel Defendant Velary Thrisha Velayathan Counsel Defendant Vishnu Kumar Counsel Defendant Wong Kah Hui Counsel Defendant

Parties (36)

A2Z TECHNOLOGY Sdn Bhd Plaintiff ASPIRE KNOWLEDGE Sdn Bhd Defendant AZ IMAN RESOURCES Sdn Bhd Defendant CIMB BANK BERHAD Aggrieved Party CIMB ISLAMIC BANK BERHAD Aggrieved Party MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD Intervener MALAYSIA AUTOMOTIVE, ROBOTICS AND IOT INSTITUTE Plaintiff MAYBANK ISLAMIC BERHAD Intervener METRO SUNGREEN Sdn Bhd Defendant PUBLIC BANK BERHAD Intervener PUBLIC ISLAMIC BANK BERHAD Intervener RHB BANK BERHAD Aggrieved Party RIZQ INTERNATIONAL Sdn Bhd Defendant WENLE HOLDINGS Sdn Bhd Defendant Ahmad Asyraf Hazwan bin Uzer Defendant Dato Muhammad Ali bin A Harun @ Hj Harun Defendant Dato Ts Mohamad Madani bin Sahari Defendant Humairah binti Mohd Ali Defendant Jenifer a/p Dennis Defendant Kuhan Arunasalam a/l Poraviappan Defendant Matin Fayzal Johanabas Defendant Matin Nazir Johanabas bin Rosman Defendant Mohammed Athar Khurshid Defendant Mohammed Zafar Khurshid Defendant Mohd Sazali Mohamed Amin Defendant Mugilan Krishnarajah a/l Krishnarajah Defendant Nedunchezhian a/l Letchumanan Defendant Norhaninawati binti Mohd Yusof Defendant Profitable Works Plt Defendant Raphael Reuben Anandan a/l Sandosh Defendant Sandosh a/l J N Anandan Defendant Su Seong Yeen Defendant Syahirah binti Mohd Ali Defendant Tan Ooi Jin Defendant Vasudevan a/l Arumugam Defendant Yeoh Sun Nee Defendant

Cases Cited (6)

MY (6)
[1997] MLJU 167 [2009] 3 MLJ 205 [2019] 10 MLJ 596 [2022] 10 MLJ 800 [2022] MLJU 3411 [2024] MLJU 243

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncc-442-07-2024)