RHB BANK BERHAD v 1. ) GRENEPARK VILLAGE SDN BHD 2. ) PARAGRENE LAND BERHAD 3. ) GREGORY AMOS YOON PENG SUM 4. ) MOHD HALIM WHY BIN ABDULLAH 5. ) WAN NOR HAYATI BINTI WAN MUSTAFHA 6. ) WAN NASIR BIN WAN MUSTAFHA

wa-22ncc-636-09-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 14 December 2025 • WA-22NCC-636-09/2025

Catchwords

Banking — Loans and facilities — Default — Summary judgment — Application under O 14 Rules of Court 2012 — Term loans and revolving bridging loan granted and fully disbursed — Corporate guarantees executed — Guarantors liable as principal debtors — Whether defendants raised bona fide triable issue — Alleged requirement to exhaust securities before action — Creditor’s right to elect and pursue concurrent remedies — Certificate of indebtedness — Whether conclusive — Absence of manifest error — Alleged repayments unsupported by evidence — Inconsistent positions in pleadings, affidavit and submissions — Whether submissions can contradict admissions — Bare denials insufficient — Whether summary judgment properly entered.

Judges (1)

Muhammad Adam bin Abdullah Delivered

Parties (7)

GRENEPARK VILLAGE Sdn Bhd Defendant PARAGRENE LAND BERHAD Defendant RHB BANK BERHAD Plaintiff Gregory Amos Yoon Peng Sum Defendant Mohd Halim Why bin Abdullah Defendant Wan Nasir bin Wan Mustafha Defendant Wan Nor Hayati binti Wan Mustafha Defendant

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncc-636-09-2025)