CRYSTAL CLEAR CLEANING SDN BHD v AEON CO. (M) BHD

wa-22ncvc-121-02-2020 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 23 July 2025 • WA-22NCvC-121-02/2020 • 18 min read

Catchwords

Introduction 1. The Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant is for the wrongful termination of a cleaning agreement entered between the Plaintiff and the Defendant on 27/11/2018 (“the Agreement”). 2. The case proceeded to a full trail where the parties relied on oral testimony of witnesses as well as documents contained in the Bundle of Document filed in Court. 36. The Court rules in this case that the termination is invalid and therefore the Plaintiff is to be compensated for the remaining duration of the Agreement of 6 months with the agreed monthly payment. 37. The Court also dismisses the Defendant’s counterclaim and awards a cost of proceeding of RM100, 000 to the Plaintiff.

Judges (1)

Akhtar bin Tahir Delivered

Counsel (5)

B H Lawrence & Co. Firm Rahman Zulkhairi Firm Dineswary Nadarajah Counsel Defendant R. Jayasingam Counsel Defendant Rajwinjit Kaur Khalae a/p Ajit Singh Khalae Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

CRYSTAL CLEAR CLEANING Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Aeon Co. Bhd Defendant

Case Significance

CRYSTAL CLEAR CLEANING SDN BHD v AEON CO. (M) BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated July 23, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-121-02-2020). The case was decided by Akhtar bin Tahir.

Key issues: Introduction.

What was the outcome of CRYSTAL CLEAR CLEANING SDN BHD v AEON CO. (M) BHD?

CRYSTAL CLEAR CLEANING SDN BHD v AEON CO. (M) BHD is a High Court decision dated July 23, 2025. The case was heard by Akhtar bin Tahir. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Contracts Act 1950 (Cap 136)

s 66

Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncvc-121-02-2020)