LOONG KEAN SENG v LOONG KEAN VOON

wa-22ncvc-187-03-2021 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 18 March 2025 • WA-22NCvC-187-03/2021 • 23 min read

17 cases cited (0 SG, 17 foreign)

Catchwords

(1) The plaintiff is the registered owner of a piece of land known as Lot 123. (2) Apply for an order to compel the defendant to return all documentations for Lot 123, the return of rental and its deposit for RM88,000.00 (3) The defendant counterclaimed against the plaintiff for an order for specific performance to compel the plaintiff to transfer and register the defendant’s ½ undivided share in said Lot 123. (4) After a full trial, I find for the plaintiff and enter a final judgment against the defendant with costs and dismissed the defendant counterclaim with costs.

Judges (1)

Hayatul Akmal binti Abdul Aziz Delivered

Counsel (5)

Hisyam Yoong – KC Lim Firm Lim Soh & Goonting Firm Franklin Goonting Counsel Plaintiff Kau Hui Ni Counsel Plaintiff Tee Kuo Ying Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

Loong Kean Seng Plaintiff Loong Kean Voon Defendant

Case Significance

LOONG KEAN SENG v LOONG KEAN VOON is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated March 18, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-187-03-2021). The case was decided by Hayatul Akmal binti Abdul Aziz.

What was the outcome of LOONG KEAN SENG v LOONG KEAN VOON?

LOONG KEAN SENG v LOONG KEAN VOON is a High Court decision dated March 18, 2025. The case was heard by Hayatul Akmal binti Abdul Aziz. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (17)

UK (1)

[1975] 1 All ER 604

MY (16)

[1950] MLJ 267 [1974] 1 MLJ 41 [1981] 1 MLJ 139 [1994] 2 MLJ 614 [1995] 3 CLJ 639 [2000] 4 MLJ 433 [2004] 4 CLJ 674 [2005] 4 CLJ 750 [2010] 1 CLJ 269 [2010] 2 MLJ 188 [2010] MLJU 1740 [2011] 6 CLJ 1 [2017] 2 MLJ 697 [2020] MLJU 871 [2022] MLJU 1912 [2022] MLJU 93

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncvc-187-03-2021)