1. ) HO KOK FAI 2. ) CHONG SIOW HUI 3. ) MAK YIP JUN 4. ) MAK YIP HON 5. ) WONG WEI WEI 6. ) ANG SIANGSWIN 7. ) OOI TIAN GUAN 8. ) YAP YI JIE 9. ) LIM BOON KIAT 10. ) THEO JWEE CHIN 11. ) SURESH A/L GNASEGARAH 12. ) NGAN CHUN MENG 13. ) MOHAMMAD FIRDAUS BIN PASRO RADZI 14. ) LEONG SOON YOOU 15. ) HOR SOO SEAN 16. ) CHONG CHEE MENG 17. ) LAU YOKE LING 18. ) CHOE KAH TUCK 19. ) TAN SOOK MUN 20. ) NGAN CHING VOON 21. ) SOO WAN RU 22. ) NGAN KAI MENG 23. ) LIEW SOOI WEI 24. ) KEE WAE LENG 25. ) L...

wa-22ncvc-438-08-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 7 May 2025 • WA-22NCvC-438-08/2023 • 18 min read
7 cases cited (0 SG, 7 foreign)

Catchwords

Whether the Plaintiffs used the correct mode of proceedings to challenge the extension of time (‘EoT’) granted to the Defendant vide the 29.6.2018 Letter - If the answer to Question 1 is negative, whether the Plaintiffs’ claim ought to be dismissed Whether the present claim is limited to LAD or challenging the amended Clauses in the SPA which are alleged to have contradicted Schedule H of the HDR 1989

Judges (1)

Aliza binti Sulaiman Delivered

Counsel (8)

Hasnan Hamzah Firm Lavina, Dell Akhbar, Tee & Partners Firm Lui & Bhullar Firm Airul Redzma Mahpor Counsel Defendant Chandni Anantha Krishnan Counsel Plaintiff Ooi Tuan Leng Counsel Defendant Tang Hui Jun Counsel Defendant Tunku Ahmad Munawir Counsel Defendant

Parties (45)

GLOMAC SEGAR Sdn Bhd Defendant SOAR HOLDINGS Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Abdul Khaliq bin Malik Plaintiff Ang Siangswin Plaintiff Chai Tze Kuen Plaintiff Chai Tze Youn Plaintiff Choe Kah Tuck Plaintiff Chong Chee Meng Plaintiff Chong Siow Hui Plaintiff Chua Kok Peng Plaintiff Edwin Tam Chee Seng Plaintiff Ho Kok Fai Plaintiff Hor Soo Sean Plaintiff Kee Wae Leng Plaintiff Kelly Lee Mee Yien Plaintiff Kenny Keh Yong Huat Plaintiff Kenny Lee Chen Ming Plaintiff Lau Yoke Ling Plaintiff Lee Li Kheng Plaintiff Lee Yuen Ping Plaintiff Leong Soon Yoou Plaintiff Liew Sooi Wei Plaintiff Lim Boon Kiat Plaintiff Loh Choi Leng Plaintiff Mak Yip Hon Plaintiff Mak Yip Jun Plaintiff Mohammad Amir Asyraf bin Md Rashid Plaintiff Mohammad Firdaus bin Pasro Radzi Plaintiff Muhammad Asyraf bin Md Sahat Plaintiff Ngan Ching Voon Plaintiff Ngan Chun Meng Plaintiff Ngan Kai Meng Plaintiff Ooi Tian Guan Plaintiff Pang Ngai Hong Plaintiff Soo Huiying Plaintiff Soo Wan Ru Plaintiff Suresh a/l Gnasegarah Plaintiff Tan Shih Nee Plaintiff Tan Sook Mun Plaintiff Theo Jwee Chin Plaintiff Tung Wai Cheng Plaintiff Wong Ann Ann Plaintiff Wong Kit Yi Plaintiff Wong Wei Wei Plaintiff Yap Yi Jie Plaintiff

Case Significance

1. ) HO KOK FAI 2. ) CHONG SIOW HUI 3. ) MAK YIP JUN 4. ) MAK YIP HON 5. ) WO... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated May 7, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-438-08-2023). The case was decided by Aliza binti Sulaiman.

What was the outcome of 1. ) HO KOK FAI 2. ) CHONG SIOW HUI 3. ) MAK YIP JUN 4. ) MAK YIP HON 5. ) WO...?

1. ) HO KOK FAI 2. ) CHONG SIOW HUI 3. ) MAK YIP JUN 4. ) MAK YIP HON 5. ) WO... is a High Court decision dated May 7, 2025. The case was heard by Aliza binti Sulaiman. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (7)

MY (7)
[2002] 3 CLJ 231 [2010] 5 CLJ 865 [2016] 8 CLJ 163 [2020] 1 MLJ 281 [2021] MLJU 713 [2024] 4 CLJ 353 [2024] 5 MLJ 897

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncvc-438-08-2023)