Greenclipper Corporation Sdn Bhd v Regal Enterprise Sdn Bhd

wa-22ncvc-469-08-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 17 June 2025 • WA-22NCvC-469-08/2022 • 23 min read

18 cases cited (0 SG, 18 foreign)

Catchwords

[1] The Plaintiff files this Suit against the Defendant seeking for the recovery of rental and delivery of vacant possession while the Defendant files a counterclaim against the Plaintiff that the Defendant be relieved against forfeiture of the tenancy, to allow further extension of the tenancy, and alternatively, cost of renovation. [2] The burden of proof is on the Plaintiff and parties are bound by the contract executed by them. The Tenancy Agreement, which terms are clear and unambiguous, must be construed in its literal and natural meaning without any addition or improvement. [3] This Court finds that the Defendant has failed to prove its counter claim, thus is dismissed with costs.

Judges (1)

Suzana binti Muhamad Said Delivered

Counsel (6)

Chong Tze Lin & Partners Firm Ho & Ho & Co. Firm Chong Tze Lin Counsel Plaintiff Ho Hon Keong Counsel Defendant Hoo Sit Huey Counsel Plaintiff Tan Hanaibal Liang Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

Greenclipper Corporation Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Regal Enterprise Sdn Bhd Defendant

Case Significance

Greenclipper Corporation Sdn Bhd v Regal Enterprise Sdn Bhd is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 17, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-469-08-2022). The case was decided by Suzana binti Muhamad Said.

Key issues: [3] This Court finds that the Defendant has failed to prove its counter claim, thus is dismissed with costs..

What was the outcome of Greenclipper Corporation Sdn Bhd v Regal Enterprise Sdn Bhd?

Greenclipper Corporation Sdn Bhd v Regal Enterprise Sdn Bhd is a High Court decision dated June 17, 2025. The case was heard by Suzana binti Muhamad Said. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Civil Law Act

s 28(4)(a)

Civil Law Act 1956

s 28(4)(a)

Courts of Judicature Act 1964 (Cap 91)

s 3

Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)

National Land Code (Cap 828)

s 237

Specific Relief Act 1950

s 21(3)

Cases Cited (18)

UK (1)

[1973] 1 WLR 601

MY (17)

[1984] 2 CLJ 268 [1984] 2 MLJ 290 [1995] 3 MLRH 196 [1995] 4 CLJ 670 [1995] 4 MLJ 673 [2003] 4 MLJ 367 [2010] 1 MLJ 597 [2014] 4 AMR 301 [2014] 4 MLJ 465 [2014] 6 CLJ 269 [2016] 1 MLJ 464 [2016] MLJU 424 [2017] MLJU 1870 [2017] MLJU 964 [2020] 1 CLJ 638 [2021] 4 MLJ 514 [2023] 1 CLJ 174

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncvc-469-08-2022)