1. ) ACCLIME CORPORATE SERVICES SDN. BHD. 2. ) HMC CORPORATE SERVICES SDN. BHD. v 1. ) WONG YOUN KIM 2. ) SYNERGY PROFESSIONALS GROUP SDN. BHD.

wa-22ncvc-647-10-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 5 May 2025 • WA-22NCvC-647-10/2024

Catchwords

By way of Enclosure 37, the plaintiff is seeking from this court to have a protective order imposed over the documents they intend to produce pending the determination of this action, allegedly so as to protect the confidentiality of those documents. In this aspect, it seems trite that the court has the power to grant a protective order by virtue of its inherent power. Pursuant thereto, the court finds a protective order is necessary in order to protect the plaintiffs' commercial interests and prevent their competitors from accessing them. In light of the same, Enclosure 37 is therefore allowed with costs in the cause.

Judges (1)

Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan Delivered

Parties (4)

ACCLIME CORPORATE SERVICES Sdn Bhd Plaintiff HMC CORPORATE SERVICES Sdn Bhd Plaintiff SYNERGY PROFESSIONALS GROUP Sdn Bhd Defendant Wong Youn Kim Defendant

Case Significance

1. ) ACCLIME CORPORATE SERVICES SDN. BHD. 2. ) HMC CORPORATE SERVICES SDN. BH... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated May 5, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-647-10-2024). The case was decided by Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan.

What was the outcome of 1. ) ACCLIME CORPORATE SERVICES SDN. BHD. 2. ) HMC CORPORATE SERVICES SDN. BH...?

1. ) ACCLIME CORPORATE SERVICES SDN. BHD. 2. ) HMC CORPORATE SERVICES SDN. BH... is a High Court decision dated May 5, 2025. The case was heard by Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan. See the full judgment for details.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncvc-647-10-2024)