7-Eleven Malaysia Sdn Bhd v 1. ) Sayuti Bin Ismail 2. ) Mohd Zulkifli Bin Rajab 3. ) Nur Nasuha Binti Abd Karim 4. ) Salasiah Binti Ismail 5. ) Azrolnizam Bin Abdul Rahman 6. ) Muhammad Hafiz Bin Azarai 7. ) Muhammad Hafiz Bin Roosli 8. ) Mohd Shahidi Bin Mohamad Wazir 9. ) Hasiffuddin Bin Roslee 10. ) Noor Shahera Binti Mohd Noor 11. ) Mohammad Mijanur Rahman
Catchwords
Keywords: Application for a Mareva Injunction and a Disclosure Order – ex-parte – converted to inter-partes – ad interim – Mareva Injunction three fold tests – good arguable case – particularization of facts and evidence – not necessary more than 50% chance of success – burden of proof lies on the Plaintiff to prove all 3 tests – assets within the jurisdiction – must produce clear evidence of the 1st and 2nd Defendants have assets within the jurisdiction and identify the assets available – must prove the existence of any evidence or facts that enables the Court to make inference that there is a real danger that the 1st and 2nd Defendants are dissipating their assets to defeat any potential judgment obtained by the Plaintiff – no proof of transfer of assets – disclosure order to assist the Plaintiff in locating the whereabout of the monies pending trial – facilitate a fair disposal of the trial
Judges (1)
Parties (12)
7-Eleven Malaysia Sdn Bhd Plaintiff Azrolnizam bin Abdul Rahman Defendant Hasiffuddin bin Roslee Defendant Mohammad Mijanur Rahman Defendant Mohd Shahidi bin Mohamad Wazir Defendant Mohd Zulkifli bin Rajab Defendant Muhammad Hafiz bin Azarai Defendant Muhammad Hafiz bin Roosli Defendant Noor Shahera binti Mohd Noor Defendant Nur Nasuha binti Abd Karim Defendant Salasiah binti Ismail Defendant Sayuti bin Ismail Defendant
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-22ncvc-697-12-2025)