CHEONG KOOI SEONG v 1. ) GOLDEN TRANSFORM SDN BHD 2. ) TETUAN ABRAHAM OOI & PARTNERS

wa-22ncvc-719-12-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 23 January 2025 • WA-22NCvC-719-12/2023

Catchwords

Interlocutory injunction. Validity of contract. Adequacy of damages. Proprietary interest. Caveat. The plaintiff applied for an interlocutory injunction to restrain the 1st defendant from disposing of property pending trial. The application arose from an alleged agreement to purchase a house which collapsed after the plaintiff refused to sign a consent form required for a guarded community. The application was dismissed. No concluded contract existed. Balance of convenience did not favour the plaintiff and damages were an adequate remedy. The court also held that the registered caveat sufficiently protected the plaintiff’s alleged interest in the property.

Judges (1)

Ahmad Shahrir b. Mohd Salleh Delivered

Parties (3)

GOLDEN TRANSFORM Sdn Bhd Defendant TETUAN ABRAHAM OOI & PARTNERS Defendant Cheong Kooi Seong Plaintiff

Case Significance

CHEONG KOOI SEONG v 1. ) GOLDEN TRANSFORM SDN BHD 2. ) TETUAN ABRAHAM OOI & P... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 23, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-719-12-2023). The case was decided by Ahmad Shahrir b. Mohd Salleh.

What was the outcome of CHEONG KOOI SEONG v 1. ) GOLDEN TRANSFORM SDN BHD 2. ) TETUAN ABRAHAM OOI & P...?

CHEONG KOOI SEONG v 1. ) GOLDEN TRANSFORM SDN BHD 2. ) TETUAN ABRAHAM OOI & P... is a High Court decision dated January 23, 2025. The case was heard by Ahmad Shahrir b. Mohd Salleh. See the full judgment for details.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncvc-719-12-2023)