1. ) LOKUS MEDICAL (M) SDN BHD 2. ) WONG POW LAI v 1. ) LOKUS/LOCUS LLC (RUSSIA) 2. ) MALKOV ANDREI VIKTOROVICH 3. ) PETRU BALMUS 4. ) ALLIANCE CONTRACT MANUFACTURING SDN BHD 5. ) TAN GING HOON 6. ) IVAN ANG KHENG HUAT
wa-22ncvc-735-10-2019 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 13 October 2025 • WA-22NCvC-735-10/2019 • 51 min read
94 cases cited
(0 SG, 94 foreign)
Catchwords
Judges (1)
Counsel (13)
Malis & Khoo Firm Raj, Ong & Yudistra Firm Simrenjeet, Tay & Co. Firm Tanes, Khoo & Paulraj Firm Damian Kiethan Counsel Defendant Izzul Faris Counsel Plaintiff James Joshua Paulraj Counsel Defendant Justin Lee Counsel Defendant Kavitharini Ramesh Counsel Defendant Layyin Teh Hassan Counsel Plaintiff Nur Dalila Counsel Defendant Nurqamarina Aqilah Roslan Counsel Defendant U. Sashiraj Counsel Defendant
Case Significance
1. ) LOKUS MEDICAL (M) SDN BHD 2. ) WONG POW LAI v 1. ) LOKUS/LOCUS LLC (RUSS... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated October 13, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-735-10-2019). The case was decided by Suzana binti Muhamad Said.
What was the outcome of 1. ) LOKUS MEDICAL (M) SDN BHD 2. ) WONG POW LAI v 1. ) LOKUS/LOCUS LLC (RUSS...?
1. ) LOKUS MEDICAL (M) SDN BHD 2. ) WONG POW LAI v 1. ) LOKUS/LOCUS LLC (RUSS... is a High Court decision dated October 13, 2025. The case was heard by Suzana binti Muhamad Said. See the full judgment for details.
Statutes Cited
Evidence Act 1950 (Cap 56)
Cases Cited (94)
UK (5)
[1964] 1 All ER 347 [1964] AC 1129 [1969] 2 Ch 106 [1971] 2 QB 354 [1993] All ER 609
MY (89)
[1939] 8 MLJ 253 [1989] 3 MLRH 605 [1990] 1 MLJ 280 [1994] 3 MLJ 777 [1995] 1 AMR 41 [1995] 1 CLJ 15 [1995] 1 MLRH 755 [1995] 2 AMR 1390 [1995] 2 AMR 1577 [1995] 2 AMR 1776 [1995] 2 CLJ 581 [1995] 2 CLJ 912 [1995] 2 MLJ 257 [1995] 2 MLJ 493 [1995] 3 CLJ 171 [1995] 3 MLRH 196 [1995] 4 CLJ 670 [1995] 4 MLJ 673 [1995] MLJU 54 [1996] 1 MLRH 548 [1996] 3 MLJ 337 [1997] 2 AMR 2044 [2002] 3 CLJ 719 [2002] 4 AMR 4383 [2005] 3 CLJ 753 [2005] 4 CLJ 871 [2005] 5 AMR 185 [2005] 6 MLJ 540 [2006] 1 AMR 461 [2006] 1 MLJ 675 [2007] 1 CLJ 611 [2007] 2 MLJ 229 [2008] 5 CLJ 737 [2008] 5 MLJ 34 [2009] 1 AMR 555 [2009] 1 CLJ 786 [2009] 2 MLJ 546 [2009] 7 MLJ 660 [2010] 1 CLJ 269 [2010] 1 MLJ 597 [2010] 5 CLJ 32 [2010] 5 MLJ 394 [2012] 2 MLRH 67 [2012] 8 MLJ 734 [2013] 7 MLJ 437 [2014] 1 CLJ 552 [2014] 4 AMR 301 [2014] 4 MLJ 465 [2014] 6 CLJ 269 [2015] 6 MLJ 810 [2015] 8 CLJ 300 [2015] AMEJ 1164 [2015] MLJU 715 [2016] 1 CLJ 177 [2016] 1 MLJ 464 [2016] 1 MLRH 673 [2016] 2 CLJ 414 [2018] 1 MLJ 784 [2018] 4 AMR 745 [2018] 6 MLJ 103 [2018] 7 CLJ 1 [2018] AMEJ 0923 [2019] 1 MLJ 421 [2019] 2 CLJ 261 [2019] 4 CLJ 409 [2019] 4 CLJ 609 [2019] AMEJ 0086 [2019] MLJU 212 [2021] 3 MLJ 365 [2021] 5 MLJ 937 [2021] 6 CLJ 157 [2021] 9 CLJ 179 [2021] MLJU 2626 [2021] MLJU 3047 [2022] 2 AMR 162 [2022] AMEJ 1566 [2022] MLRH 664 [2023] 1 CLJ 564 [2023] 11 MLJ 581 [2023] 6 CLJ 76 [2023] AMEJ 0523 [2024] 10 MLJ 406 [2024] 5 AMR 662 [2024] 7 CLJ 410 [2024] 8 AMR 97 [2024] MLJU 1034 [2024] MLJU 2523 [2025] 8 AMR 961 [2026] 1 MLJ 172
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-22ncvc-735-10-2019)