1. ) YEOH CHEONG YEOW 2. ) JIMMY ONG KIM HENG v GLOMAC SEGAR SDN BHD

wa-22ncvc-775-12-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 7 May 2025 • WA-22NCvC-775-12/2024 • 18 min read

7 cases cited (0 SG, 7 foreign)

Catchwords

Whether the Plaintiffs used the correct mode of proceedings to challenge the extension of time (‘EoT’) granted to the Defendant vide the 29.6.2018 Letter - If the answer to Question 1 is negative, whether the Plaintiffs’ claim ought to be dismissed Whether the present claim is limited to LAD or challenging the amended Clauses in the SPA which are alleged to have contradicted Schedule H of the HDR 1989

Judges (1)

Aliza binti Sulaiman Delivered

Counsel (8)

Hasnan Hamzah Firm Lavina, Dell Akhbar, Tee & Partners Firm Lui & Bhullar Firm Airul Redzma Mahpor Counsel Defendant Chandni Anantha Krishnan Counsel Plaintiff Ooi Tuan Leng Counsel Defendant Tang Hui Jun Counsel Defendant Tunku Ahmad Munawir Counsel Defendant

Parties (3)

GLOMAC SEGAR Sdn Bhd Defendant Jimmy Ong Kim Heng Plaintiff Yeoh Cheong Yeow Plaintiff

Case Significance

1. ) YEOH CHEONG YEOW 2. ) JIMMY ONG KIM HENG v GLOMAC SEGAR SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated May 7, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-775-12-2024). The case was decided by Aliza binti Sulaiman.

What was the outcome of 1. ) YEOH CHEONG YEOW 2. ) JIMMY ONG KIM HENG v GLOMAC SEGAR SDN BHD?

1. ) YEOH CHEONG YEOW 2. ) JIMMY ONG KIM HENG v GLOMAC SEGAR SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated May 7, 2025. The case was heard by Aliza binti Sulaiman. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (7)

MY (7)

[2002] 3 CLJ 231 [2010] 5 CLJ 865 [2016] 8 CLJ 163 [2020] 1 MLJ 281 [2021] MLJU 713 [2024] 4 CLJ 353 [2024] 5 MLJ 897

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncvc-775-12-2024)