PORATHA CORPORATION SDN.BHD. v DSCAFF ENGINEERING SDN.BHD.

wa-22ncvc-837-12-2020 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 8 May 2025 • WA-22NCvC-837-12/2020 • 3 min read

Catchwords

Contract – the term 'as is where is' basis cannot be implied and must be expressly stated in the contract, communicated and understood between parties. Evidence - Documentary evidence produced and tendered that is not challenged by the plaintiff is sufficient to provide proof of a claim.

Practice Areas

Contract

Judges (1)

Su Tiang Joo Delivered

Counsel (6)

Lewis Lim & Min Lee Firm Samrith Sanjiv & Partners Firm Justin Ong Shen Wei Counsel Defendant Lim Tiong Wee Counsel Defendant Pramjit Singh a/l Raghbir Singh Counsel Plaintiff Sanjivpal Singh Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

DSCAFF ENGINEERING Sdn Bhd Defendant PORATHA CORPORATION Sdn Bhd Plaintiff

Case Significance

PORATHA CORPORATION SDN.BHD. v DSCAFF ENGINEERING SDN.BHD. is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated May 8, 2025 (citation: wa-22ncvc-837-12-2020). The case was decided by Su Tiang Joo.

What was the outcome of PORATHA CORPORATION SDN.BHD. v DSCAFF ENGINEERING SDN.BHD.?

PORATHA CORPORATION SDN.BHD. v DSCAFF ENGINEERING SDN.BHD. is a High Court decision dated May 8, 2025. The case was heard by Su Tiang Joo. See the full judgment for details.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-22ncvc-837-12-2020)