AUMADA ENERGY & TECHNOLOGIES (M) SDN BHD v KENNY BENARD SAW

wa-24-71-07-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 27 January 2025 • WA-24-71-07/2024 • 14 min read

10 cases cited (0 SG, 10 foreign)

Catchwords

The plaintiff seeks to be granted an abridgement of time to file and submit a Notice of Appeal against the Industrial Court Awad No. 495 of 2024 dated 03.04.2024 allegedly received by the plaintiff on 30.04.2024 in the Industrial Court Case No.: 11/4-613/22 within 7 days from the date the Court's order. I find the plaintiff has failed to prove it’s case and I dismissed the plaintiff’s application with costs of RM2,000.00 to be paid within 30 days from the date of this Order.

Judges (1)

Hayatul Akmal binti Abdul Aziz Delivered

Counsel (5)

Chai & Partners Firm Devan & Associates Firm Devan Narayanan Raman Counsel Plaintiff Paari Perumal Counsel Defendant Puthan Perumal Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

AUMADA ENERGY & TECHNOLOGIES Sdn Bhd Applicant Kenny Benard Saw Respondent

Case Significance

AUMADA ENERGY & TECHNOLOGIES (M) SDN BHD v KENNY BENARD SAW is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 27, 2025 (citation: wa-24-71-07-2024). The case was decided by Hayatul Akmal binti Abdul Aziz.

What was the outcome of AUMADA ENERGY & TECHNOLOGIES (M) SDN BHD v KENNY BENARD SAW?

AUMADA ENERGY & TECHNOLOGIES (M) SDN BHD v KENNY BENARD SAW is a High Court decision dated January 27, 2025. The case was heard by Hayatul Akmal binti Abdul Aziz. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Industrial Relations Act 1967 (Cap 177)

s 33C

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (10)

MY (10)

[1972] 2 MLJ 109 [1975] 2 MLJ 129 [1981] 1 MLJ 251 [1982] 1 MLJ 105 [1984] 1 CLJ 154 [2003] 1 CLJ 429 [2003] 2 AMR 110 [2021] 2 MLRH 313 [2024] 5 MLRH 508 [2024] 6 CLJ 716

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-24-71-07-2024)