TANJUNG RATNA SDN BHD v SLG CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD
Catchwords
Enclosure 1. Enclosure 1. CONSTRUCTION LAW – Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (CIPAA) – Adjudication decision – Application to set aside – Section 15(b) CIPAA – Alleged denial of natural justice – Scope of court’s supervisory jurisdiction – Distinction between procedural fairness and merits review – Failure to consider submissions – Presumption that adjudicator considered all materials – Materiality of alleged breach – Whether adjudicator required to address every argument or evidence – Whether alleged errors of fact, law or contractual interpretation are grounds for setting aside – Stay of adjudication decision – Section 16(1)(b) CIPAA – Stay pending arbitration – Whether the existence of parallel arbitration sufficient – Clear and unequivocal error – Threshold – Justice of the case – Balance between cashflow objective and parties’ substantive rights – Financial standing of successful party – Whether adjudication process rendered nugatory – Section 28 CIPAA – Enforcement of adjudication decision as judgment of court – Prerequisites for enforcement – Adjudication decision not set aside or stayed – Court’s limited discretion –
Judges (1)
Case Significance
TANJUNG RATNA SDN BHD v SLG CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated November 10, 2025 (citation: wa-24c-163-10-2025). The case was decided by Rajes Raghavji.
Key issues: Section 28 CIPAA – Enforcement of adjudication decision as judgment of court – Prerequisites for enforcement – Adjudication decision not set aside or stayed – Court’s limited discretion –.
What was the outcome of TANJUNG RATNA SDN BHD v SLG CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD?
TANJUNG RATNA SDN BHD v SLG CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated November 10, 2025. The case was heard by Rajes Raghavji. See the full judgment for details.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-24c-163-10-2025)