MERCU BINARAYA SDN BHD v JETSON CONSTRUCTION SDN BHD

wa-24c-201-12-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 1 April 2024 • WA-24C-201-12/2023 • 30 min read

16 cases cited (1 SG, 15 foreign)

Catchwords

Whether the Adjudicator had acted in excess of his jurisdiction as Mercu is not an “unpaid party” within the meaning of s 4 CIPAA - Whether there is denial of the rules of natural justice when the Adjudicator decided not to refer to the contents of the Adjudication Response

Judges (1)

Aliza binti Sulaiman Delivered

Counsel (5)

Gregory Yusran & Associate Firm Harold & Lam Partnership Firm Felicia Lai Wai Kim Counsel Plaintiff Jagesh Mehalingam Counsel Defendant Syairah Zamri Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

JETSON CONSTRUCTION Sdn Bhd Respondent MERCU BINARAYA Sdn Bhd Applicant

Statutes Cited

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (16)

SG (1)

[2015] SGCA 42

MY (15)

[2016] MLJU 1776 [2017] 7 AMR 887 [2017] MLJU 377 [2018] 10 CLJ 293 [2018] 2 MLJ 22 [2018] MLJU 1860 [2019] 10 MLJ 58 [2019] 2 CLJ 229 [2020] MLJU 1405 [2020] MLJU 1503 [2020] MLJU 1927 [2021] MLJU 2249 [2022] MLJU 770 [2023] MLJU 1257 [2024] MLJU 1907

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-24c-201-12-2023)