SETIA UTAMA LRT 3 SDN BHD (Sebelum ini dikenali sebagai MRCB George Kent Sdn Bhd) v 1. ) SIEMENS MOBILITY SDN BHD 2. ) SIEMENS MOBILITY GMBH 3. ) RASMA CORPORATION SDN BHD
10 cases cited
(0 SG, 10 foreign)
Catchwords
Judges (1)
Counsel (12)
Azman Davidson Firm Shearn Delamore & Co. Firm Alexius Simon Lee Kim Soon Counsel Plaintiff Allen Cheng Peng Han Counsel Defendant Dhinesh Bhaskaran Counsel Plaintiff Eg Sze Pei Counsel Plaintiff Georgina Lim Ern Ling Counsel Defendant Joel Low Seong Lin Counsel Defendant Michelle Lim Wan Foong Counsel Plaintiff Rajendra Navaratnam Counsel Defendant Serena Isabelle Azizuddin Counsel Plaintiff Wong Jia Jing Counsel Plaintiff
Case Significance
SETIA UTAMA LRT 3 SDN BHD (Sebelum ini dikenali sebagai MRCB George Kent Sdn ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated August 24, 2025 (citation: wa-24c-22-01-2025). The case was decided by Nadzarin bin Wok Nordin.
What was the outcome of SETIA UTAMA LRT 3 SDN BHD (Sebelum ini dikenali sebagai MRCB George Kent Sdn ...?
SETIA UTAMA LRT 3 SDN BHD (Sebelum ini dikenali sebagai MRCB George Kent Sdn ... is a High Court decision dated August 24, 2025. The case was heard by Nadzarin bin Wok Nordin. See the full judgment for details.
Statutes Cited
Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)
Rules of Court 2012
Cases Cited (10)
MY (10)
[1966] 2 MLJ 174 [1995] 1 MLJ 719 [1995] 3 CLJ 520 [1999] 2 MLJ 385 [2006] 3 MLJ 554 [2007] 7 MLJ 1 [2014] 3 MLJ 672 [2016] 2 MLJ 428 [2017] MLJU 1452 [2020] 8 MLJ 503
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-24c-22-01-2025)