Damansara Realty (Johor) Sdn Bhd v Perbadanan Putrajaya

wa-24c-37-02-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 3 July 2025 • WA-24C-37-02/2025 • 13 min read

3 cases cited (0 SG, 3 foreign)

Catchwords

Enclosusre 1. In Originating Summons No. WA-24C-24-01/2025 (OS 24), Perbadanan Putrajaya (“PP”) had applied to this court under section 15 (b) and (d) of the Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012 (“CIPAA”) to set aside the Adjudication Decision dated 10.1.2025 (“AD”) given in favour of Damasara Realty (Johor) Sdn Bhd (“DRSB”). We also have Originating Summons No. WA-24C-25-01/2025 (OS 25) where PP has applied to stay the AD pursuant to section 16 CIPAA. Finally, there is Originating Summons No. WA-24C-37-02/2025 (OS 37) in which DRSB has applied to enforce the said Ad in accordance with section 28 CIPAA. All the above 3 Originating Summons were heard together before this Court.

Judges (1)

Nadzarin bin Wok Nordin Delivered

Counsel (6)

Mohanadass Partnership Firm Zahir Khailani Firm Anusha a/p Asokakumar Counsel Plaintiff Indah Murnimuunira binti Ramdhan Counsel Defendant Nurzali Bin Mohd Taib Counsel Defendant Shamsul Bahrin bin Abdul Manaf Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

DAMANSARA REALTY Sdn Bhd Applicant Perbadanan Putrajaya Respondent

Case Significance

Damansara Realty (Johor) Sdn Bhd v Perbadanan Putrajaya is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated July 3, 2025 (citation: wa-24c-37-02-2025). The case was decided by Nadzarin bin Wok Nordin.

What was the outcome of Damansara Realty (Johor) Sdn Bhd v Perbadanan Putrajaya?

Damansara Realty (Johor) Sdn Bhd v Perbadanan Putrajaya is a High Court decision dated July 3, 2025. The case was heard by Nadzarin bin Wok Nordin. See the full judgment for details.

Cases Cited (3)

MY (3)

[2004] 1 MLJ 257 [2008] 2 MLJ 137 [2016] MLJU 1776

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-24c-37-02-2025)