R A H v R A L
5 cases cited
(0 SG, 5 foreign)
Catchwords
Family law - Dispute over control of frozen embryos - Whether Applicant was entitled to sole custody, care and control of the remaining two frozen embryos - Whether embryos have legal personhood - Whether intention of Parties was ascertained - Whether consent of Parties was required for future use of embryos - Whether the right to procreate prevailed over the right not to be a parent – Federal Constitution article 5 Family law – Child born via IVF after couple had divorced – Whether father of child was obligated to maintain her - Whether lump-sum was permitted for child maintenance – Whether Applicant had justified lump-sum child maintenance of MYR1,440,000 or monthly child maintenance of MYR7,500 - Guardianship of Infants Act 1961
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (6)
Parties (2)
Case Significance
R A H v R A L is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated February 20, 2025 (citation: wa-24f-190-07-2024). The case was decided by Evrol Mariette Peters.
What was the outcome of R A H v R A L?
R A H v R A L is a High Court decision dated February 20, 2025. The case was heard by Evrol Mariette Peters. See the full judgment for details.
Statutes Cited
Cases Cited (5)
UK (4)
[1979] QB 276 [1998] AC 245 [2007] EWCA Crim 2016 [2022] EWHC 1619
IN (1)
(2009) 9 SCC 1
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-24f-190-07-2024)