1. ) TEE WEE SIONG 2. ) TEE E VA v 1. ) MIDIOS SDN BHD 2. ) KEDIOS BERHAD 3. ) TAN CHIN HORNG 4. ) TAN KIM LIAN 5. ) VILOR PARTNERS BERHAD 6. ) GOH YOK MOU 7. ) CHAN BOON LEONG 8. ) WONG YIT FONG 9. ) LEE YEN CHEA 10. ) LUM SIN YI 11. ) LEONG ZHAN WEI 12. ) LAI CHIA SHING 13. ) TEA YONG WU 14. ) OOH CHIN HOOI @ WOO CHIN HOOI 15. ) EDUVER EDUCATION BERHAD
wa-24ncc-253-05-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 28 April 2026 • WA-24NCC-253-05/2025 • 16 min read
4 cases cited
(0 SG, 4 foreign)
Catchwords
Company Law – Removal of Directors, Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM), Statutory Rights of Shareholders, Internal Management Principle, Requisition of Meetings - Statutory Rights vs. Judicial Restraint – Whether the statutory rights of shareholders to convene an EGM (Section 310) and remove directors (Section 206) under the Companies Act 2016 can be restrained by an interlocutory injunction based on allegations of mala fides without cogent evidence. Civil Procedure – Interlocutory Injunction – Keet Gerald Test – American Cyanamid Principles – Balance of Convenience – Adequacy of Damages – Strict Construction of Injunctive Orders – Whether an existing injunction restraining the appointment of new directors can be broadly interpreted to prohibit the removal of existing directors, or if such orders must be strictly construed due to their penal character. Judicial Interference – Rule in Foss v Harbottle, Interference with the Administration of Justice, Monatech Principle - Application of the Monatech Principle – Whether the removal of directors constitutes an "interference with the due administration of justice" or the "wanton destruction of the substratum" of a related pending suit regarding the validity of share transfers. Equity & Remedies – Rescission of Share Sale Agreements (SSAs), Fraudulent Misrepresentation, Conspiracy. Piercing the Corporate Veil – Interlocutory Stage – Whether the court should disregard the separate legal personalities of requisitioning shareholders to find they are "proxies" or "shadow directors" based solely on contested affidavit evidence. Balance of Convenience – Corporate Governance – Whether the potential harm to a director's office is remediable by damages or consequential court orders, and if such harm outweighs the immediate suspension of shareholders' statutory voting rights.
Practice Areas
Judges (1)
Counsel (7)
Parties (17)
EDUVER EDUCATION BERHAD Respondent KEDIOS BERHAD Respondent MIDIOS Sdn Bhd Respondent VILOR PARTNERS BERHAD Respondent Chan Boon Leong Respondent Goh Yok Mou Respondent Lai Chia Shing Respondent Lee Yen Chea Respondent Leong Zhan Wei Respondent Lum Sin Yi Respondent Ooh Chin Hooi @ Woo Chin Hooi Respondent Tan Chin Horng Respondent Tan Kim Lian Respondent Tea Yong Wu Respondent Tee E Va Applicant Tee Wee Siong Applicant Wong Yit Fong Respondent
Statutes Cited
Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)
Rules of Court 2012
Cases Cited (4)
UK (2)
[1947] 2 All ER 372 [1975] AC 396
MY (2)
[1995] 1 MLJ 193 [2002] 4 MLJ 241
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-24ncc-253-05-2025)