TECHCREW SDN. BHD. v MIRACLE ASSET BUILDER SDN BHD

wa-24ncc-415-08-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 16 December 2024 • WA-24NCC-415-08/2024 • 23 min read

7 cases cited (0 SG, 7 foreign)

Catchwords

COMPANIES LAW: Winding-up – Fortuna injunction – Restraint of winding-up petition – Judgment debt – Whether statutory notice invalid for want of leave under Order 46 Rule 2 of ROC 2012 – Whether statutory notice invalid for non-disclosure of payments received – Whether pending parallel proceedings create bona fide dispute of debt – Whether garnishee proceedings constitute abuse of process – Whether court may restrain winding-up petition pending appeal in separate proceedings CIVIL PROCEDURE: Execution – Judgment debt – Enforcement proceedings – Winding-up as enforcement mechanism – Whether winding-up proceedings constitute execution proceedings – Whether judgment lapses after six years – Whether leave of court required to commence winding-up proceedings based on judgment over six years old

Judges (1)

Atan Mustaffa Yussof Ahmad Delivered

Counsel (8)

C Sankaran & Co Firm Clinton Tan Firm C. Sankaran Counsel Plaintiff Clinton Tan Counsel Defendant Harishdeep Singh Counsel Defendant Maithily Manoher Counsel Plaintiff Reuben Netto Counsel Plaintiff Sovitra Sukahut Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

MIRACLE ASSET BUILDER Sdn Bhd Respondent TECHCREW Sdn Bhd Applicant

Statutes Cited

Bankruptcy Act 1967 (Cap 360)

Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (7)

MY (7)

[1999] 4 MLJ 637 [2010] MLJU 2217 [2016] 4 MLJ 314 [2018] 7 CLJ 303 [2019] 3 MLJ 485 [2020] 3 MLJ 692 [2024] 9 CLJ 245

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-24ncc-415-08-2024)