TTDI KL METROPOLIS SDN BHD v China Construction Yangtze River (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd

wa-24ncc-45-01-2026 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 5 March 2026 • WA-24NCC-45-01/2026 • 11 min read

9 cases cited (0 SG, 9 foreign)

Catchwords

Company Law - Winding up - Fortuna Injunction - Whether adjudicated debt under CIPAA remains disputable - Adjudication decision pending setting aside under CIPAA and cross claims in arbitration - Whether Fortuna Injunction may be granted after presentation and advertisement of winding-up petition - Injunction post- presentation of winding up petition to be sought in winding up court - Companies Act 2016, ss 465 & 466 - Construction Industry Payment and Adjudication Act 2012, s.28

Practice Areas

Judges (1)

Elaine Yap Chin Gaik Delivered

Counsel (7)

Christopher Lee & Ong Firm Lee & Poh Partnership Firm Choon Hon Leng Counsel Defendant Hazelyn Khoo Hui Ying Counsel Plaintiff Khor Yongshi Counsel Defendant Oon Khai Yue Counsel Plaintiff Wang Siew Woon Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

CHINA CONSTRUCTION YANGTZE RIVER Sdn Bhd Respondent TTDI KL METROPOLIS Sdn Bhd Applicant

Statutes Cited

Companies Act 1965 (Cap 777)

Cases Cited (9)

MY (9)

[2002] 4 CLJ 391 [2007] 2 CLJ 305 [2008] 1 CLJ 632 [2011] 1 CLJ 947 [2018] MLJU 10 [2019] 3 CLJ 499 [2024] 4 MLJ 67 [2024] MLJU 2210 [2024] MLJU 2738

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-24ncc-45-01-2026)