KERK HAN MENG v 1. ) LEE YU MENG 2. ) KUA CHIN WEE 3. ) WONG KOK KHEONG 4. ) SIM CHIN HU 5. ) CJ POLYMERS SDN BHD

wa-24ncc-547-10-2023 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 8 December 2025 • WA-24NCC-547-10/2023 • 14 min read
7 cases cited (2 SG, 5 foreign)

Catchwords

Civil Procedure - Plaintiff's application for injunctive relief - Mareva freezing injunction - Requirements for granting a Mareva injunction - Whether the Plaintiff has a good arguable case - Whether the Defendant has assets within the jurisdiction - Whether there is a real risk of dissipation - Good arguable case demonstrated - Assets existed within the jurisdiction - No real risk of asset dissipation established - Allegations of dishonesty alone are not an indication of dissipation risk - Plaintiff's argument that their application was for a proprietary injunction, not a Mareva injunction - No jeopardy to assets - Application for injunctive relief dismissed

Practice Areas

Civil Procedure

Judges (1)

Elaine Yap Chin Gaik Delivered

Counsel (15)

Alvin Tang Law Office Firm Douglas Yee Firm K Nadarajah & Partners Firm S. Muhillan Firm Tang Hong & Lock Firm AG Kalidas Krishnan a/l Gnanaprakasam Counsel Defendant Alvin Tang Wye Keet Counsel Defendant Chin Wui Imm Counsel Defendant Goh Zhi En Counsel Plaintiff Lock Jun Qi Counsel Plaintiff Muhillan a/l Sivananthan Counsel Defendant Siew Choo Jern Counsel Defendant Sum Pui Si Counsel Defendant Wesley Wong Ray Fung Counsel Defendant Yap Boon Hau Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (6)

CJ POLYMERS Sdn Bhd Respondent Kerk Han Meng Applicant Kua Chin Wee Respondent Lee Yu Meng Respondent Sim Chin Hu Respondent Wong Kok Kheong Respondent

Statutes Cited

Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)
s 346

Cases Cited (7)

SG (1)
[2015] SGCA 45
SLR (1)
[2015] 5 SLR 558
UK (2)
[2004] EWHC 76 [2021] 1 WLR 170
MY (3)
[1985] 1 MLJ 62 [1989] 2 MLJ 153 [2022] MLJU 3411

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-24ncc-547-10-2023)