ENERGY EQUIPMENT TECH SDN BHD v STRIKE MARINE (M) SDN BHD

wa-24ncc-611-12-2024 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 20 August 2025 • WA-24NCC-611-12/2024 • 14 min read

12 cases cited (0 SG, 12 foreign)

Catchwords

Fortuna Injunction - Sections 465(1)(e) & 466(1)(a) Companies Act 2016 - Two cumulative limbs - Bona fide disputed debt on substantial grounds - Letter of Assurance - Contractual interpretation - Express terms preserving primary obligations - Entire agreement clause - No variation without written amendment - Failure to dispute invoices - Non-response to demand letters in commercial context - Afterthought allegations inconsistent with contemporary documents - Abuse of process - Commercial solvency - Cash flow versus balance sheet solvency.

Judges (1)

Wan Muhammad Amin bin Wan Yahya Delivered

Counsel (5)

Emir Mahmud & Co. Firm Ong, Ric & Partners Firm Ahmad Sobir Bin Ahmad Zakir Counsel Defendant Lee Chia Yee Counsel Plaintiff Mahmud Bin Abdul Jumaat Counsel Defendant

Parties (2)

ENERGY EQUIPMENT TECH Sdn Bhd Applicant STRIKE MARINE Sdn Bhd Respondent

Case Significance

ENERGY EQUIPMENT TECH SDN BHD v STRIKE MARINE (M) SDN BHD is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated August 20, 2025 (citation: wa-24ncc-611-12-2024). The case was decided by Wan Muhammad Amin bin Wan Yahya.

What was the outcome of ENERGY EQUIPMENT TECH SDN BHD v STRIKE MARINE (M) SDN BHD?

ENERGY EQUIPMENT TECH SDN BHD v STRIKE MARINE (M) SDN BHD is a High Court decision dated August 20, 2025. The case was heard by Wan Muhammad Amin bin Wan Yahya. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)

Cases Cited (12)

MY (12)

[1978] 2 MLJ 81 [1988] 2 MLJ 449 [1999] 1 AMR 1187 [1999] 5 MLRH 826 [2001] 3 CLJ 248 [2007] 4 MLJ 355 [2008] 3 CLJ 215 [2011] 1 CLJ 947 [2012] 6 MLJ 817 [2014] 9 MLJ 125 [2016] 10 CLJ 247 [2016] 9 CLJ 73

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-24ncc-611-12-2024)