Kytari Sdn Bhd v Mutiara Etnik Sdn Bhd

wa-24ncc-68-02-2026 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 28 April 2026 • WA-24NCC-68-02/2026 • 23 min read

19 cases cited (0 SG, 19 foreign)

Catchwords

Fortuna injunction – The defendant issued a statutory notice against the plaintiff based an adjudication award under CIPAA – Whether the winding up petition has a good chance to succeed – Whether the adjudicated sum is a bona fide disputable debt as there is an ongoing dispute over such sum – Whether the plaintiff has a bona fide cross-claim against the defendant – Whether it is relevant that the plaintiff suffers irreparable harm due to the presentation of a winding-up petition

Judges (1)

Quay Chew Soon Delivered

Counsel (8)

Izral Partnership Firm Vince Chong Partnership Firm Alicia Ng Yan Ying Counsel Defendant Chua Yi En Counsel Defendant Jane Chan Counsel Plaintiff Suvitra Morais Counsel Plaintiff Tharminder Singh Counsel Plaintiff Thum Shi Yhing Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

KYTARI Sdn Bhd Applicant MUTIARA ETNIK Sdn Bhd Respondent

Statutes Cited

Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)

Specific Relief Act 1950 (Cap 137)

Cases Cited (19)

UK (3)

[1975] 1 All ER 504 [1975] AC 396 [1980] 1 All ER 241

MY (16)

[1995] 1 MLJ 193 [2002] 3 CLJ 380 [2003] 6 MLJ 311 [2007] 3 CLJ 295 [2007] 3 MLJ 316 [2007] 4 MLJ 355 [2010] MLJU 1668 [2011] 1 CLJ 947 [2015] MLJU 1951 [2019] 3 CLJ 499 [2019] 3 MLJ 244 [2019] 8 CLJ 433 [2020] 6 MLJ 224 [2021] 9 CLJ 880 [2022] 1 MLJ 458 [2024] 4 MLJ 67

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-24ncc-68-02-2026)