MULTAZAM DEVELOPMENT SDN BHD v DIRIJOHAN SDN BHD

wa-24ncc-781-07-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 12 July 2023 • WA-24NCC-781-07/2022 • 14 min read

7 cases cited (0 SG, 7 foreign)

Catchwords

Injunction - Fortuna Injunction - Companies Act 2016 - Section 466 Notice - Whether statutory notice validly issued by wound up company - Sanction from Director General of Insolvency - Whether fresh sanction required for issuing statutory notice - Defensive action - Section 471 CA 2016 - Whether leave required to commence proceedings against wound up company - Judgment debt – Whether there is bona fide dispute of debt - Whether pending appeal constitutes bona fide dispute of debt - Failure to comply with conditional stay order - Test for Fortuna injunction - Irreparable damage

Judges (1)

Wan Muhammad Amin bin Wan Yahya Delivered

Counsel (7)

Amar Syiimir Izzat & Sham Firm Mohaji Hazury & Ismail Firm Ahmad Syiimir Bin Suffian Counsel Plaintiff Maisarah Binti Ahmad Tarmizi Counsel Plaintiff Mohaji bin Selamat Counsel Defendant Mohd Amin Bin Arsan Counsel Defendant Mohd Shahrysham Bin Kamran Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (2)

DIRIJOHAN Sdn Bhd Respondent MULTAZAM DEVELOPMENT Sdn Bhd Applicant

Statutes Cited

Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)

Courts of Judicature Act 1964 (Cap 91)

Indian Companies Act

s 171

Cases Cited (7)

UK (1)

[1959] Ch 229

MY (6)

[2002] 2 MLJ 1 [2007] 4 MLJ 355 [2008] 3 MLJ 692 [2009] 1 MLRH 800 [2010] MLJU 2217 [2022] MLJU 244

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-24ncc-781-07-2022)