GUNASILAN A/L RENGASAMY v 1. ) MUNUSAMY A/L KARUPPIAH @ MANO 2. ) MARAGATHAM A/P KARUPPIAH 3. ) BALA SUBRAMANIAM A/L MUTHAIAH 4. ) RAMANATHAN A/L GOVINDAN 5. ) RAVAITHIREN A/L THANABALAN 6. ) PRABAVATHY RAVAITHIREN 7. ) CHANDRAMOGAN A/L THEVASUNDRAM 8. ) NITYA KALYANI A/P CHANDRAMOGAN 9. ) RUKUMANI 10. ) NIVEDHA A/P CHANDRAMOGAN @ KAVITA

wa-24ncvc-199-01-2025 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 21 July 2025 • WA-24NCvC-199-01/2025

Catchwords

Injunction – plaintiff as the elected President of the Association which is entitled to manage the Temple is entitled to a mandatory injunction for vacant possession thereof with the view to manage the same

Judges (1)

Su Tiang Joo Delivered

Parties (11)

Bala Subramaniam a/l Muthaiah Respondent Chandramogan a/l Thevasundram Respondent Gunasilan a/l Rengasamy Applicant Maragatham a/p Karuppiah Respondent Munusamy a/l Karuppiah @ Mano Respondent Nitya Kalyani a/p Chandramogan Respondent Nivedha a/p Chandramogan @ Kavita Respondent Prabavathy Ravaithiren Respondent Ramanathan a/l Govindan Respondent Ravaithiren a/l Thanabalan Respondent Rukumani Respondent

Case Significance

GUNASILAN A/L RENGASAMY v 1. ) MUNUSAMY A/L KARUPPIAH @ MANO 2. ) MARAGATHAM ... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated July 21, 2025 (citation: wa-24ncvc-199-01-2025). The case was decided by Su Tiang Joo.

What was the outcome of GUNASILAN A/L RENGASAMY v 1. ) MUNUSAMY A/L KARUPPIAH @ MANO 2. ) MARAGATHAM ...?

GUNASILAN A/L RENGASAMY v 1. ) MUNUSAMY A/L KARUPPIAH @ MANO 2. ) MARAGATHAM ... is a High Court decision dated July 21, 2025. The case was heard by Su Tiang Joo. See the full judgment for details.

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-24ncvc-199-01-2025)