ENDLESS CORPORATE SDN. BHD. v 1. ) GS REALTY SDN. BHD. 2. ) TETUAN PATRICK YEOH & COMPANY 3. ) YEOH ENG KONG

wa-24ncvc-2327-08-2022 High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) 15 June 2025 • WA-24NCvC-2327-08/2022 • 25 min read

46 cases cited (0 SG, 46 foreign)

Catchwords

[1] The Plaintiff files an application for committal against the 3rd Defendant (D3) (Enclosure 165) and the 1st Defendant (D1) also files the same against the 2nd Defendant (D2) and D3 (Enclosure 169) upon obtaining the order for leave to commence committal proceedings granted by this Court on 17.03.2025. Thereafter, D2 and D3 applied to set aside the order that granted leave for the Plaintiff (Enclosure 174) and D1 (Enclosure 176). [2] Article 126 of the Federal Constitution provides the power of this Court to deal with punishment on contempt- “Power to punish for contempt 126. The Federal Court, the Court of Appeal or a High Court shall have power to punish any contempt of itself.”. This provision is further reiterated in section 13 of the Courts of Judicature Act 1964 (Act 91). [3] For these reasons, Enclosure 174 and 176 are dismissed and Enclosure 165 and Enclosure 169 are allowed with costs. This Court therefore, passed the sentence as recorded and ordered accordingly. [4] Subsequent to the sentencing orders, learned counsels for D2 and D3 made an oral application under Order 52 R7 of the ROC to stay the imprisonment order. The application was allowed by this Court subject to compliance of the terms.

Judges (1)

Suzana binti Muhamad Said Delivered

Counsel (9)

Neik & Partners Firm Patrick Yeoh & Company Firm T.Y. Teh & Partners Firm Datuk Teh Tse Yee Counsel Plaintiff Ho Chong En Counsel Plaintiff Jazz Cheah Counsel Defendant Keshwinder Singh Counsel Defendant Peter Neik Counsel Defendant Wong Xiu Tian Counsel Plaintiff

Parties (4)

ENDLESS CORPORATE Sdn Bhd Applicant GS REALTY Sdn Bhd Respondent TETUAN PATRICK YEOH & COMPANY Respondent Yeoh Eng Kong Respondent

Case Significance

ENDLESS CORPORATE SDN. BHD. v 1. ) GS REALTY SDN. BHD. 2. ) TETUAN PATRICK YE... is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated June 15, 2025 (citation: wa-24ncvc-2327-08-2022). The case was decided by Suzana binti Muhamad Said.

Key issues: [3] For these reasons, Enclosure 174 and 176 are dismissed and Enclosure 165 and Enclosure 169 are allowed with costs. This Court therefore, passed the sentence as recorded and ordered accordingly..

What was the outcome of ENDLESS CORPORATE SDN. BHD. v 1. ) GS REALTY SDN. BHD. 2. ) TETUAN PATRICK YE...?

ENDLESS CORPORATE SDN. BHD. v 1. ) GS REALTY SDN. BHD. 2. ) TETUAN PATRICK YE... is a High Court decision dated June 15, 2025. The case was heard by Suzana binti Muhamad Said. See the full judgment for details.

Statutes Cited

Companies Act 2016 (Cap 777)

Courts of Judicature Act 1964 (Cap 91)

s 13

Criminal Procedure Code (Cap 593)

Federal Constitution

Art 126

Penal Code (Cap 574)

Rules of Court 2012

Cases Cited (46)

MY (46)

[1948] MLJ 17 [1977] 1 MLJ 151 [1980] 2 MLJ 13 [1980] 2 MLJ 195 [1981] 1 MLJ 315 [1986] 2 MLJ 193 [1989] 2 CLJ 373 [1989] 2 MLJ 281 [1993] 2 AMR 1205 [1993] 2 MLJ 217 [1993] 3 CLJ 210 [1994] 4 CLJ 1002 [1996] 4 MLRH 150 [1996] 5 MLJ 521 [1997] 1 MLRH 669 [1997] 2 MLJ 472 [1997] 3 AMR 2401 [1997] 3 CLJ 197 [1997] 3 MLJ 240 [1998] MLJU 125 [2007] MLJU 822 [2012] 2 AMR 429 [2012] 2 CLJ 849 [2012] 3 MLJ 458 [2012] 4 MLJ 137 [2012] 6 AMR 221 [2012] 8 CLJ 667 [2013] 2 MLJ 251 [2015] 4 CLJ 113 [2015] 5 AMR 146 [2015] 7 CLJ 252 [2016] 1 CLJ 52 [2016] 2 MLRH 31 [2016] 7 MLJ 1 [2017] 11 MLJ 513 [2017] 5 CLJ 371 [2017] MLJU 2307 [2018] 3 MLJ 715 [2018] 6 CLJ 573 [2019] 9 CLJ 153 [2020] 5 MLJ 277 [2020] 6 AMR 801 [2020] 8 CLJ 147 [2021] 2 MLJ 259 [2021] 3 CLJ 443 [2024] 3 CLJ 669

Judgment

Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.

Read on eJudgment

Source: eJudgment (wa-24ncvc-2327-08-2022)