WONG TUNG KEN v DING U CHIN
Catchwords
In the Originating Summons, the plaintiff seeks, amongst others, to set aside the private caveats entered into by the defendant on three (3) properties registered in the plaintiff's name with the defendant as the beneficial owner. The court finds that the defendant failed to disclose a serious question to be tried. The defendant has not demonstrated any valid undisputed facts supporting his right to maintain the caveats. As an important note, it must be emphasised that the plaintiff has never objected to the defendant's ownership rights and entitlement to the properties. As can be seen from the prayers in the Originating Summons, the plaintiff's action is in total compliance with the Deed of Mutual Understanding, including acknowledgement of the plaintiff's 50% share. Due to the above, Enclosure 1 is allowed with no order as to costs.
Parties (2)
Case Significance
WONG TUNG KEN v DING U CHIN is a High Court (Mahkamah Tinggi) decision dated January 22, 2025 (citation: wa-24ncvc-3813-10-2024). The case was decided by Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan.
Key issues: Due to the above, Enclosure 1 is allowed with no order as to costs..
What was the outcome of WONG TUNG KEN v DING U CHIN?
WONG TUNG KEN v DING U CHIN is a High Court decision dated January 22, 2025. The case was heard by Raja Ahmad Mohzanuddin Shah bin Raja Mohzan. See the full judgment for details.
Judgment
Read the full judgment on the official Malaysia Courts portal.
Read on eJudgmentSource: eJudgment (wa-24ncvc-3813-10-2024)